Zelda vs Halo

What do you guys think is better, Zelda or Halo games?

i like them both i can't decide

halo is fun but zelda has alot more depth.

Okay, pitting Halo against Metroid I can understand. But THIS?

The two are just about as opposite sides of the spectrum as you can get! Sci-fi/Fantasy FPS/Third-person adventure-platformer-puzzle.

Seriously, c'mon! There is no way the two can be compared.

no if you have the imagination i believe you can compare the two. besides they aernt really fighting each other this is just a thread that asks about preference.

Okay in that case, who do you think would win, Samus Aran, or Spartan 117 ie Master Chief? or what game do you thinks better, Halo, or Metroid?

Check the 41 page thread. Called Caster Chief vs. Samus Aran. Honestly people.

ZELDA!!!

Halo is good at multiplayer. Zelda HAS no multiplayer. Halo wins.

Zelda wins

Halo wins. No compition

ZELDA!!! One of the best games for the best system ever... Link to the Past baby! Ocarina was quite good too, as was Wind Waker. Oh, and all the rest of them too. Cuz Zelda's freaking awesome. It's a dynasty man. And it hasn't gotten nearly as old as other game dynasties.

Halo's got 2 games.

Ultimately, it comes down to genre though, which is a matter of personal taste. Puzzles, swords, and magic vs. guns, and lots of em.

So Halo has MP.

Zelda has a much better singleplayer game and the replaybility factor as does Halo.

And in terms of games, Halo is not even close to the Legend of Zelda: Orcina Of Time (yes i know I spelt in wrong).

Single Player
---------------

Zelda beats Halo, but not but a long shot. They are two different genre games: One with mythical adventure and the other a hardcore FPS. Zelda's huge single player campaign beats Halo's out by a few good hours.

EDGE: Zelda

Multiplayer
------------
Halo has multiplayer, which is it's strongest factor. Zelda(frachise) is good with the Four Swords, but lacked online play.

EDGE: Halo

Sound
-------
It's hard to tell, because both the games have great SFX and theme music.

EDGE: Tie.

Replayability Factor
----------------------
Halo wins on this one, since you could break it out anytime at a party with friends. Zelda's replayability is good(especially Four Swords) but it lacks depth.

EDGE: Halo

Want me to get more?

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Okay, pitting Halo against Metroid I can understand. But THIS?

The two are just about as opposite sides of the spectrum as you can get! Sci-fi/Fantasy FPS/Third-person adventure-platformer-puzzle.

Seriously, c'mon! There is no way the two can be compared.

Originally posted by DarkAnakin226
Okay in that case, who do you think would win, Samus Aran, or Spartan 117 ie Master Chief? or what game do you thinks better, Halo, or Metroid?

Originally posted by DarkAnakin226
Okay in that case, who do you think would win, Samus Aran, or Spartan 117 ie Master Chief? or what game do you thinks better, Halo, or Metroid?

Halo has got multiplayer which is alot better than playing on your own. Plus the whole online aspect blows Zelda out of the water.

Originally posted by Dizzle
ZELDA!!! One of the best games for the best system ever... Link to the Past baby! Ocarina was quite good too, as was Wind Waker. Oh, and all the rest of them too. Cuz Zelda's freaking awesome. It's a dynasty man. And it hasn't gotten nearly as old as other game dynasties.

Halo's got 2 games.

Ultimately, it comes down to genre though, which is a matter of personal taste. Puzzles, swords, and magic vs. guns, and lots of em.

Some older games seem better than newer ones, Zelda hands down! No one likes the Xbox anyway, it's pants!

How can a game be better because there is more sequels? Then the Final Fantasy games must be the best ever plus the numerous Dragon Ball Z games. Not the stongest point now is it?

Quality over quantity.