What would you think of this??

Started by Fishy3 pages

No

humans would not be able to surivive if we were the only living species on the planet. it seriously would be impossible. because everything is alive.

but that would mean i'd have to give up my pets cry

I can't go on with out meat.. If that were so I'd atleast make it so cows were kept..

*shivers at the thought of eating Human meat*

And how about all the products made from trees and stuff. Gum, paper, etc. etc.

Plus, animals save human lives, and also help us. Think about it. Seeing-eye dogs. Bomb sniffer dogs. Drug sniffer dogs.

And how about mentally and emotionally. I know, even though it may sound strange, that I can always look to my dog and talk to him. She will never judge me, simply love me. (Of course, that could be because I feed her... but you get the point.)

Originally posted by eleveninches
Humans are good because of what they ARE, not what they DO.
Animals and other non-humans are bad because of what they ARE, rather than because of what they DO.

🤨 you this is probably the strangest thing I have ever heard

I personally belive that Animals Humans and Trees and Stones and whatever are morally on the same level. But we are more powerful so we can take advantage of our surroundings...but we should keep a decent level for all of nature...because we need it

And in that way no animals would quite suck ✅

Originally posted by PVS
but that would mean i'd have to give up my pets cry

So pets is what you call that...you making me sick...SICK SICK SICK I say...you psycho 😆

Originally posted by Bardock42
🤨 you this is probably the strangest thing I have ever heard

Going quite nicely with possibly the strangest topic I've ever heard...

If it was just us on the planet, even if we could over come the issues of food and breathing (pretty big issue there!), then who would want to live on a completely barren rock? I love my scenery too much!

Completely apart from that, i love my pets too much to give them up. Photos may now follow of Snarf and Bacon, my two rats.. See what you started!! 😄

Originally posted by Fionnuala
😆 yeah it does..I prefer them generally but some humans are even lower than animals..

Are even lower? In many ways they are ahead of us. They create a natural balance between themselves and nature, which makes both survive.
Humans destroy nature and are destroyed by it. We don't live with it, we try to take our advantage out of it, which does not work.

Without any other living form, except humans, we wouldn't survive 5 minutes. We need the Oxigen from the trees and the seaweed, plus all the food which was both mentioned before.
We would live on barren land, with nothing but ourselves.
So many things are made out of living things. Paper, Alcohol. We'D had no wood, just stones to build things.

It wouldn't work and I wouldn't want to live that way. Because apart from all of that, I love animals. I admire those creatures, that are able to live without the destruction of nature and they are good and loyal friends to humans.

Yea well I think they are neither wprse no better....don't see a reason why they should anyways

How boring it would be without animals...who would I talk to????

Originally posted by debbiejo
How boring it would be without animals...who would I talk to????

Your hand?

😂 No..that would be quite boring...I would always know what it's gonna say.

Originally posted by eleveninches
I still think it would be much nicer if there were no non-human lifeforms on earth. That would mean no bugs or viruses.
On the other hand, it would also mean no trees

the earth would look like the moon, there is nothing interesting about the moon.

True, this would be a horrible place...Imagine no green! No colors of the flowers...gee, I wouldn't want to live here.

Originally posted by Bardock42
🤨 you this is probably the strangest thing I have ever heard

I personally belive that Animals Humans and Trees and Stones and whatever are morally on the same level. But we are more powerful so we can take advantage of our surroundings...but we should keep a decent level for all of nature...because we need it

And in that way no animals would quite suck ✅


So are you saying that trees and rocks should have human rights. When was the last time you treat a tree as though it has any human rights??? Non-humans exist for us (humans) to use as we see fit.

Originally posted by debbiejo
😂 No..that would be quite boring...I would always know what it's gonna say.

Hmm maybe you should evolve some shizophrenic tendencies then 😄

Originally posted by Fire
the earth would look like the moon, there is nothing interesting about the moon.

Dude.....the moon rocks (notice the Dude in the bginning can anyone figure why I used that?) Still the moon is cool

Originally posted by eleveninches
So are you saying that trees and rocks should have human rights. When was the last time you treat a tree as though it has any human rights??? Non-humans exist for us (humans) to use as we see fit.

No that is not what I am saying...what I am saying is that Humans Animals Plants all got the same moral level....Because we are more poweful than them we can deal with them as we please ..... not having them around would be pretty bad though

Originally posted by Bardock42

No that is not what I am saying...what I am saying is that Humans Animals Plants all got the same moral level....Because we are more poweful than them we can deal with them as we please ..... not having them around would be pretty bad though

Maybe if they send an ambassador..they could stay.

Animals have ambassadors already, they are called pigeons and they shit on everything humans ever made

Originally posted by debbiejo
Maybe if they send an ambassador..they could stay.

They can stay....but we can rule them .....yea