Originally posted by Peach
A rather large number of people do buy it primarily for the blu-ray, though. A significant enough number that the system has half the software-attack rate as the 360. You saying "I don't think so and I did this" does not change the numbers.
This is an old post but:
That is a misconception. The PS3 actually had a higher attach rate than the 360 for the 2009 fiscal year. The 2010 fiscal year isn't over until April, so we can only speculate on what the attach rate for the 2010 fiscal year was, but I wouldn't be surprised if Sony was ahead again. Either way "half the attach rate" isn't even remotely accurate. I suppose that if we looked at only American sales figures, the 360's attach rate might be higher (the PS3 is like the metric system, it scares Americans) but World Wide that PS3 had a higher software attachment rate than the 360 the last time data was shown.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Do you have trouble with basic logic? haermm
Watch me use logic! Your signature is of Master Chief. Your location is "Reach." Also your opinions are skewed towards the 360 with fanatical zeal of an peerless X-bot. Reach (like every Halo on the 360) is graphicaly below the current average. It doesn't even look as good as the first Gears of War... and yet you think it's graphics are comparable to God of War 3. Hence: obvious Halo fanboy who's opinions hold very little validity. Boom, logic at work!
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Short answer: Yes you do have trouble with basic logic!
Before I make fun of you some more, what do you believe is the inherent "logic" behind your delusional belief that Reach's graphics are comparable to God of War 3? Do you have trouble parsing simple visual information, because anyone with even partially working eye sight can see God of War is 20 times more impressive visually than Reach.
Before this goes any further, let me just say that I wasn't aware you were capable of talking like someone who isn't twelve years old. Posts such as these:
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Maybe you should stick to playingTribesHalo, and not share your embarrassing opinions with anyone?
Made me think otherwise. Are you ready to have a discussion with me like a big boy? If you're not, then we won't. I dont' really care how smart you think you are, I don't care about the topic at hand nearly enough to have a conversation with someone who is going to mud sling at every turn in his posts.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Before this goes any further, let me just say that I wasn't aware you were capable of talking like someone who isn't twelve years old. Posts such as these:Made me think otherwise. Are you ready to have a discussion with me like a big boy? If you're not, then we won't. I dont' really care how smart you think you are, I don't care about the topic at hand nearly enough to have a conversation with someone who is going to mud sling at every turn in his posts.
Yes, because my post is more akin to the childish rhetoric of 12 year old than your "Yeah, Killzone blows, even by generic FPS standards," a string of one word "lol" post, and the classic rebuttal "You're a fanboy!!!!" 🙄
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Yeah, a personal attack on someone is much more childish than a general statement of opinion aimed at no one in particular. That is generally how it works in the adult world.
You perceive someone calling your opinion embarrassing, as a personal attack? And having register that as a "personal attack," your response is "you're a fanboy!!!"
Do you always work this hard not to be taken seriously?
Killzone has a very generic premise, leaving aside any technical merits it might have. Space setting: cool. Human Nazi-like enemies: generic. Tech and art direction: cool but also generic at the same time.
Never underestimate the fans value for the world building, nevertheless it has enough fans for it to have 3 games or maybe more.
Originally posted by Peach
A rather large number of people do buy it primarily for the blu-ray, though. A significant enough number that the system has half the software-attack rate as the 360. You saying "I don't think so and I did this" does not change the numbers
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
This is an old post but:That is a misconception. The PS3 actually had a higher attach rate than the 360 for the 2009 fiscal year. The 2010 fiscal year isn't over until April, so we can only speculate on what the attach rate for the 2010 fiscal year was, but I wouldn't be surprised if Sony was ahead again. Either way "half the attach rate" isn't even remotely accurate. I suppose that if we looked at only American sales figures, the 360's attach rate might be higher (the PS3 is like the metric system, it scares Americans) but World Wide that PS3 had a higher software attachment rate than the 360 the last time data was shown.
Great, and who is right now? You guys should really post sources, otherwise I will be forced to Google it myself.....and no one wants that.