it is true.. I looked on www.snopes.com and there is a pictures and a big article on it
it happened way back in 1939
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Five year old motherHmmm...
Originally posted by Morning_Gloryi don't doubt what you say...but after reading some of the posts on here, i can't help wonder: why all the silliness of arguing over something that happened years ago on the validity of the claim....if i had to post my input, i would say: wow!!! bummer
it is true.. I looked on www.snopes.com and there is a pictures and a big article on itit happened way back in 1939
Originally posted by KidRock
ha she got owned.
At first I didn't get it. After I thought about it. I got it. Dude, that is so horribly and disgustingly funny. Once I got it, I literally laughed out loud and said "OMG!!! That guy is right."
That will leave emotional scars on you for life. I remember all the way back to about a year and a half...if she evens remembers back to three...it has got to be horrible.
Originally posted by dadudemon
That will leave emotional scars on you for life. I remember all the way back to about a year and a half...if she evens remembers back to three...it has got to be horrible.
And yet still you find the emotional scares left from the rape of a 4 year old to be a funny subject matter?
Originally posted by KharmaDog
And yet still you find the emotional scares left from the rape of a 4 year old to be a funny subject matter?
Of course not...don't be absurd. If look for the negative in everything, reality is not enjoyable...lighten up a bit.
I thought that KidRock's perspective was humorous in a horrible and disgusting way. Did you read my post?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Of course not...don't be absurd. If look for the negative in everything, reality is not enjoyable...lighten up a bit.I thought that KidRock's perspective was humorous in a horrible and disgusting way. Did you read my post?
I read your post. You said that you saw humour in Kidrock's comment and that you thought, "OMG!!! That guy is right."
What am I missing? What didn't I understand?
I do not look for the negative in everything, in fact I look for the humour in most things, but in some things there is no humour, a guy raping a 4 year old and her getting pregnant is one of those things. I guess we just have to agree to disagree on that issue.
i just think it is another prank that was succeeded in everyone to believe.
i think when snopes went to look it up, everyone did believe in it, and there were no sites to say it was fake because after all it was 1939, things were easier to make people believe then now days...and it just led to where people now days do believe it.
and that pic on snopes of the pregnant girl looks really fake.