Do Away With World Hunger.

Much of the world's massive hunger problems could be solved by the reduction or elimination of meat-eating. The reasons: 1) livestock pasture needs cut drastically into land which could otherwise be used to

grow food; 2) vast quantities of food which could feed humans is fed to livestock raised to produce meat.
This year alone, twenty million people worldwide will die as a result of malnutrition. One child dies of malnutrition every 2.3 seconds. One hundred million people could be adequately fed using the land freed if Americans reduced their intake of meat by a mere 10%.

Twenty percent of the corn grown in the U.S. is eaten by people. Eighty percent of the corn and 95% of the oats grown in the U.S. is eaten by livestock. The percentage of protein wasted by cycling grain through livestock is calculated by experts as 90%.

One acre of land can produce 40,000 pounds of potatoes, or 250 pounds of beef. Fifty-six percent of all U.S. farmland is devoted to beef production, and to produce each pound of beef requires 16 pounds of edible grain and soybeans, which could be used to feed the hungry.

Do you agree???

I'll believe that what you said is true, but I won't believe that if I stop eating meat I'll save thousands of hungry children. The whole world will never be vegetarian.

Or if the richest one % gave half a shit about anyone else...
That might help too.

But your ignoric politics, If we gave up eating all meat and grew crops instead would it sove world hunger? No! WE have excess food now and we still don't give it away. What makes you think we'd do it then?

See, world hunger could be done away with...But because many don't care, or because of politics..it won't happen...Who should be point our finger at???

The people spending trillions on weapons would be a start.

-AC

Well....it would of course be a very nice utopia if all people live in peae and no one needs to fear hunger...but with current politics it is not possible...although there would techniacally be the possibility (even without baning meat)

Then, it's all OUR fault..because WE let it happen..

Originally posted by debbiejo
Then, it's all OUR fault..because WE let it happen..

THere is no fault.... we didn't even choose how many people we want ....and whatever since WE don't care (except for some people that think not eating meat will change everythign 🙄 )

I think there will always be world hunger... No matter what.... there's always going to several thousand people dying of hunger......

I'm not trying to take your burger from you...Just, that that article makes since..There are things that can be done and this is just ONE example, of course.

Well you see maybe we don't nwant to do anything....the US has a surplus of crops that could possibly save a lot of humans but they don't giuve it away......for several reasons....but why do you want to do away with world hunger anyways...whats your reasons?

Originally posted by AdventChild
I think there will always be world hunger... No matter what.... there's always going to several thousand people dying of hunger......

I disagree in some szenarios there could be a possibility of no world hunger

Oh yeah, it's MY fault that the federal government is ****ed, nevermind the fact that I didn't exist when it started being that way. 🙄 I am trying, but it's not easy when nobody else is.

System of a Down- Boom

I've been walking through your streets
where all your money is earned
where all your buildings are crying
And clueless neckties working
revolving fake lawn houses
housing all your fears
desensitized by TV
over bearing advertising
God of consumers
and all your crooked creatures looking good
Mirrors filtering information through the public eye
Designed for profit sharing
Your neighbor, what a guy

BOOM
BOOM
BOOM

Everytime your drop the bomb
You kill the God
Your child is born

BOOM
BOOM
BOOM
BOOM

Modern globalization
coupled with condemnations
unnecessary death
matador corporations
puppeting your frustrations with a blinded flag
manufacturing consent is the name of the game
the bottom line is money and nobody gives a f**k
4,000 hungry children leave us per hour from starvation
while billions are spent creating death showers

BOOM
BOOM
BOOM

Everytime your drop the bomb
You kill the God
Your child is born
Why must we kill our own kind

BOOM
BOOM
BOOM

How did it come to this 🙁

M'kay...lets go back to discussion...please.....

I know for a fact that the Kent orchards were deliberately grubbed to no purpose. There's efficiency for you!

Sounds convincing to me. I'd give up eating meat to feed more people, but it would have to be everyone giving up meat and not just a couple people choosing to be vegetarian.

But it would definitely take a lot of fun out of eating.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Much of the world's massive hunger problems could be solved by the reduction or elimination of meat-eating. The reasons: 1) livestock pasture needs cut drastically into land which could otherwise be used to

grow food; 2) vast quantities of food which could feed humans is fed to livestock raised to produce meat.
This year alone, twenty million people worldwide will die as a result of malnutrition. One child dies of malnutrition every 2.3 seconds. One hundred million people could be adequately fed using the land freed if Americans reduced their intake of meat by a mere 10%.

Twenty percent of the corn grown in the U.S. is eaten by people. Eighty percent of the corn and 95% of the oats grown in the U.S. is eaten by livestock. The percentage of protein wasted by cycling grain through livestock is calculated by experts as 90%.

One acre of land can produce 40,000 pounds of potatoes, or 250 pounds of beef. Fifty-six percent of all U.S. farmland is devoted to beef production, and to produce each pound of beef requires 16 pounds of edible grain and soybeans, which could be used to feed the hungry.

Do you agree???

how about we just eat starving children? reduces food expenditure and reduces amount of hungry people - 2 birds, 1 stone

The fact that people are hungry is true. The Possibility that anyone could do anything about it is bull. If people would get a work ethic in America they wouldn't be hungry. Now in other countries it's the governments fault. China for example won't except our help, they barely allow any foreigners into their country period.

If people lets say only ate meat only once a day, the cattle farmers would have downsize their meat production. The land wouldn't stay vacant. They would have to find another crop to grow.

Bardock and why would I want to get rid of world hunger??? Why Not!
Maybe I have a god complex...

Originally posted by Chiram
The fact that people are hungry is true. The Possibility that anyone could do anything about it is bull. If people would get a work ethic in America they wouldn't be hungry. Now in other countries it's the governments fault. China for example won't except our help, they barely allow any foreigners into their country period.

We're not talking about people in America and China, we're talking about the 40,000 some people who die of hunger every day in sub-Saharan Africa and etc.

You tell me that I make no difference... At least I'm ****ing trying, what the **** have YOU done?!