Different situation people died testing the X planes too
No one doubts the shuttle is a giant firework, and its crazy its still used thats two major disasters with it.
I find Reagans speech quoting the old airmans poem, "they reeched out to touch the face of god", still one of the most moving ever for the Discovery disaster, last year should never of happened.
Originally posted by RaeRox
then the people who died on the shuttle last year were fakes?
Re: Has man landed on the moon
Originally posted by whirlysplat
Has man landed on the moon?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear All,
my debate is a simple on. Has man landed on the moon? (Unlike I usually do), right from the outset I'm giving my opinion on the matter (and don't tell me you can see the lander from the surface of the earth because the keck - most powerful telescope - can't)
1. Van Allen Belts - High and intense radiation, NASA says that the rocket was travelling so fast that the astronauts would have been unaffected by the short term exposure despite the fact that they had NO...repeat...NO PROTECTION AT ALL!.....yet not one person who went to the moon ever got cancer to my knowledge...hmmm
2. The Saturn V rocket (the one which took people to the moon), ALL plans and designs were "mysteriously" lost...please see following link
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...s_what_s_needed
now, forgive me for being slightly suspicious, but would not the equipment which made possible such a great technical achievement be copied and copied and studied etc?
3. Photographs - We've all seen the LUDICROUS photographs:
a) Shadows going off in different directions despite one light source
b) All photographs coming out picture perfect despite hugely
different light and dark tones on the surface
c) Pathetic jumps by the astronauts given their weight/gravity (it
was calculated that given their weight and the moons gravity,
they should have been moving much differently than they did
d) Perfect lander landing...despite the fact that in the earth
environment, there are movies showing that Armstrong/Aldrin
found it difficult to control in an EARTH environment
e) The most convincing for me was on a documentary, where it
showed 2 bits of film, one being shot 2 miles away from the other
(and facing a different way), however when superimposed, it
should them going up the same mound ROCK for ROCK
f) Chest height cameras impossible angles (all clear)
g) No blast crater (despite considerable downward force while landing)
h) I can go on...3. The sun spitting out high levels of radiation at that time (again no protection for the astronauts
I can go on...but I ramble on....what do we all think?
Or is this part of the conspiracy
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
There's a thread about this about every other day at the paranormal/conspiracy board at GameFAQ. The most popular reply is this:
Or is this part of the conspiracy Swanky?
Plausible denial 😄
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
There's a thread about this about every other day at the paranormal/conspiracy board at GameFAQ. The most popular reply is this:
Originally posted by Chiram
I think may have possibly heard they are allowing passenger trip to the moon. Like for 300,000 or more. I may be wrong though.
Yeah, your wrong, but your only off by $700,000. You take a trip into space for a cool million, No moon trip though.
If the moon landing were fake, that would mean that the Americans diddnt obtain the technology to land on the moon. If they diddnt have the technology to land on the moon in july of 69, or in November of 69, why did Nasa disclose their rocketry to Russia?
Re: Re: Has man landed on the moon
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
There's a thread about this about every other day at the paranormal/conspiracy board at GameFAQ. The most popular reply is this:
Firstly Swanky I have read this thread and I see some flaws.
Secondly - the site does deal with the "kilometers apart - same hill" argument, which they put down to a simple error (how convenient - but I'll take their answer)
Thirdly - Van Allen belts...an hour of exposure to lethal radiation?, no the metal hulls DID NOT PROTECT the astronauts from the lethal radiation, but again, no astronaut had ANY symptoms of cancer after an hour or more of being exposed to lethal radiation...hmmm, it's also quite funny how the same NASA scientists are now quoting "space radiation" as a hazard for getting a man to mars, well going by the moon landing, there is NO space radiation besides the belts themselves...
Fourth - People inside of NASA have started talking about the programme etc...
http://www.aulis.com/nasa2.htm
Fifth - The earth reflecting light causing the different shadow directions/ moons surface reflecting light, the site then contradicts itself in that it says that if there were 2 or more light sources, there would be multiple shadows 9 WHICH THERE ISN'T (but according to it, there was in the earth/the surface itself and the sun)
that's all for now...I need to do some work before I get fired! - but alas if someone debunks every argument out there with GOOD evidence...then I can be swayed (I'm not one to ignore evidence, even if it goes against my own preconceived ideas!)