Poll
73%
27%
0%
I'm just curious what people think Superman is going to do to Spawn, At that rate, what is Spawn going to do to Superman? All Spawn needs to do is take superman into Hell, however, i doubt Spawn could pull that one off. There is no way Spawn can entrance Superman. these two would just beat the shit out of each other untill one of the two got bored. they could not do anything critical enough to each other. Even if supes did kill spawn, he would just keep comming back. Spawns chains and hell powers are NOT going to kill Superman.
His credentials as an artist have never been in doubt
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
He is a superb artist and a sensible writer, so what ever his business decesions or complications are, i dont care. As for promosing the various titles to his fans, i remeber that. He never promised or stated anything. He said he was working on new idea's that is all he said.
As far as his writing goes.....well I am glad you like it. Personally I have got far more pleasure out of the works of both Alan Moore and Neil Gaiman and I think if you asked most fans and critics above the age of 12 they would agree that along with Frank Miller you have the three most influential comic writers of all time. The fact the Mr Mcfarlane, who henceforth I will refer to as "The Toddler" as prevented one of Moores greatest works Miracleman being published for the last decade as meant a whole generation have been deprived of perhaps his greatest work. The fact the Toddler tried to lay claim to it prevented Gaiman writing new stories for the character and issue 25 onwards being published.
For more details and how the Toddler lost in court see here
http://www.alanmoorefansite.com/faq/miracleman.html
for another losing day in court for the toddler and more questionable ethics see here
for more on the Toddler try a google search on "Todd Mcfarlane Miracleman Gaiman Lawsuit" or "Todd Mcfarlane creditors" or "Todd Mcfarlane Tony Twist" or "Todd Mcfarlane owes money"
He is not a nice man
Keep the faith
😠
who the hell ever compared mcfarlene to moore in the first place? I just said i thought he was asensible writer and that is more than can be said for %80 of todays writers. I could give a flip less what he has screwed people out of with miracleman. His accompishments with Spawna nd spiderman are far greater than anything moore would have done with yet another pansy in tights.
Besides i think you forget that there is always two sides to every story, and in the case of a miracleman who cares? In that article it says Mcfarlene bought the rights to miracle man, and was going to give them to moore for owed royalties from Spawn. this is to much arguing for a character i could care less about.
Originally posted by whirlysplat
I hate Todd Mcfarlaneheres why:
at least he tyes up story-lines unlike DC and Marvel at times
in a way other than with one bound are hero was free that's for 3 year olds that technique
Just one of the things done with a "pansy" in tights storyline
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
who the hell ever compared mcfarlene to moore in the first place? I just said i thought he was asensible writer and that is more than can be said for %80 of todays writers. I could give a flip less what he has screwed people out of with miracleman. His accompishments with Spawna nd spiderman are far greater than anything moore would have done with yet another pansy in tights.Besides i think you forget that there is always two sides to every story, and in the case of a miracleman who cares? In that article it says Mcfarlene bought the rights to miracle man, and was going to give them to moore for owed royalties from Spawn. this is to much arguing for a character i could care less about.
Well I could care about it, as it was far superior to Spawn, at least in the eyes of most who have actually read both 🙄 Its easy though to have opinions on things you have never read. Well done!! 😄
Truncated version
Madness or modernity?: The Holocaust in two Anglo-American comics
Robert Eaglestone
Royal Holloway, University of London
Abstract:
This article looks at the ways in which the two Anglo-American comics, Desert Peach and Miracleman, explain the Holocaust. I highlight their differences from Maus, the starting point for nearly all discussions in English about comics and the Holocaust. Donna Barr's Desert Peach is about the fictional younger brother of Erwin Rommel, the 'Desert Fox'. The stories are rather like a World War II German version of M*A*S*H. However, her account of the Holocaust offers the widely accepted and widely criticized 'good German' story: that, although the SS and Nazi High Command were perpetrators in the genocide, the 'Honourable' German army were bystanders who did not commit atrocities. Her basically liberal paradigm means that 'Nazi madness' is the only explanation. In contrast, Alan Moore's superhero allegory, Miracleman suggests that there is an inextricable alliance between modernity and the death camps. By highlighting the similarities between this and Adorno's discussion of the 'myth of the Enlightenment', I suggest that this story, in which blond Aryan superheroes take over the world is a conscious allegory for the Holocaust and is both a warning about the power of Enlightenment thought and an analysis of it.
for full thesis
Just one of the things he did with the "pansy" in tights
"I wish people would research there posts" Rages Reamorse May 2005 do Aliens exist thread
Keep the faith 😄 Keep it Whirly 😇