Originally posted by mr.smiley
Me? 😆and you realy think your having an end depth discussion? 😆
wtf is an end depth discussion?
Originally posted by KidRock
Why would someone feel embarrassed over the internet?
for making a complete fool out of himself....meh forget it, if you could understand that you wouldnt even post here 🙄
Originally posted by PVS
wtf is an end depth discussion?for making a complete fool out of himself....meh forget it, if you could understand that you wouldnt even post here 🙄
Maybe you are so attached to these forums you feel embaressed, but why the hell would someone feel embaressed becuase of a post he made on a movie message board to a bunch of people he doesnt know, and will never meet?
Big Evil> Some of the comments you have posted in this thread are blatantly racist, and should not be tolerated on these boards. As with everyone constantly refering to you as a "Satan Worshipper" of some type, I ask that those taunts please be moved and the topic be allowed to move on.
PVS> Why do you even bother trying to prove your points to smiley and KidRock? They are both obviously foolish people with petty bias'. Move on, since you'll get no where talking to fools like them.
I also have a crazy theory that mr.smiley may in fact be O'Rielly in disguise. 😛
BTW> I have watched O'Rielly often in the past, mostly to get a laugh at how stupid he really is. Nearly everything the others in this thread have stated are true.
O'Rielly will fight his point to the point that it is no longer a two-sided debate, but rather a one-sided, petty, "I win" ceremony, even though he's never even successfully "won" a "debate" on his show. He's a foolish man who doesn't deserve to be on television, (and yet it seems more and more idiots are being allowed to be on TV). CNN used to be an interesting channel to watch, until Bush came into office. Now it's typical Republican bias. Actually, all U.S. television is becoming more Republican biased.
BTW 2> I agree that the female lawyer, (Rosa something, if I recall correctly), should have said "Yes" and tried to explain her stance, yet O'Rielly would have merely turned it against her into a "So you support the Terrorists" "debate", (again, more like a one-sided "I win" ceremony).
Sorry liberal the "you're a rascist" power doesn't work on me, infact most of your powers are useless lol..
For one, I said I was against O Reilly's harsh stance on immigration and think our borders should be wide open because foreighners are some of the most appreciative hard-working people you'll ever meet. OMG HOW HATEMONGERING! They should send your ass to Mexico, not the aliens..
Second emotion, I worship Satan, boogaboogabooga! You can't expect something evil to not show up in my posts, hell it's in my name for crying outloud..
Thirdly, ehmm, oh hell this is stupid. Your post was a useless attempt at trying to make me out to be one of those hard-nosed republican biggots and it didn't work. As it's so fricking obvious i'm a crazy socialist strung out on caffiene it isn't even a debate. Much like your mother did at raising you, you failed at this topic, and your life. Go away.
Originally posted by Big Evil
Sorry liberal the "you're a rascist" power doesn't work on me, infact most of your powers are useless lol..For one, I said I was against O Reilly's harsh stance on immigration and think our borders should be wide open because foreighners are some of the most appreciative hard-working people you'll ever meet. OMG HOW HATEMONGERING! They should send your ass to Mexico, not the aliens..
Second emotion, I worship Satan, boogaboogabooga! You can't expect something evil to not show up in my posts, hell it's in my name for crying outloud..
Thirdly, ehmm, oh hell this is stupid. Your post was a useless attempt at trying to make me out to be one of those hard-nosed republican biggots and it didn't work. As it's so fricking obvious i'm a crazy socialist strung out on caffiene it isn't even a debate. Much like your mother did at raising you, you failed at this topic, and your life. Go away.
Ha. Touché. 🙄
I could sit here and try to argue with you, but what's the point? When I said that comment about you using racial slurs, it was directed at the "they get what they deserve" remark you made regarding the Middle-East. I'm sorry if I did not make this clear.
Oh, and, childish taunts about how my mother raised me do not offend me. It seems you're just about as original as mr.smiley. Go play at the park, little one.
BTW> In case anybody is wondering, I am a Canadian, and deeply against the increasing American presence in the Middle-East. On that note, I'm also upset that Canadians are over in those countries fighting wars and keeping peace where Americans should be stationed, (at least more so).
So wait.. then why are you spouting your opinion at ALL?
You're not American.
You're not Middle-Eastern.
What our country does is none of your concern, so you're just some ******* sticking his two-cents in where it doesn't belong..
Also might I add they DO get what they deserve. It's not rascist, they rape, pillage, and destroy. I want you to be PC when they stick a bomb up your butt and pee on your face dilweed. I know the war was a sham but that's like saying "Oh, they arrested Charles Manson on some deep hidden conspiracy! That means he's innocent!" no dumbass, it means they had an altirior motive. But Charly was still a mean-ass killer man..
Or does having legal marijunna in Canada and you taking advantage kill what little brain-cells you had left to wrap your head around that?
Originally posted by Big Evil
So wait.. then why are you spouting your opinion at ALL?You're not American.
You're not Middle-Eastern.What our country does is none of your concern, so you're just some ******* sticking his two-cents in where it doesn't belong..
Also might I add they DO get what they deserve. It's not rascist, they rape, pillage, and destroy. I want you to be PC when they stick a bomb up your butt and pee on your face dilweed. I know the war was a sham but that's like saying "Oh, they arrested Charles Manson on some deep hidden conspiracy! That means he's innocent!" no dumbass, it means they had an altirior motive. But Charly was still a mean-ass killer man..
Or does having legal marijunna in Canada and you taking advantage kill what little brain-cells you had left to wrap your head around that?
May I ask what the white, Christian Europeans did during the Crusades? Or the American soldiers during the Vietnam War? They raped, pillaged, and mercilessly killed people. I'm sure this is going on today as well, over in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is no difference.
And why the hell are you bringing up Charles Manson? There's another thread open to discussion about him somewhere....
"Legal Marijuana"? What crack is U.S. government feeding you? Marijuana is not "legal" in Canada, not at all. It is still highly illegal, and a very dangerous substance to use. However, the Canadian government is intelligent enough to understand that there are worse drugs and forms of self-abuse than marijuana, so punishments on marijuana use are more lenient.
TrAnCeDuO> I learned long ago not to take people like these seriously....🙄
😕
Bravo, my dear comedian....😛
You know, Big Evil, you remind me of a local Christian parishoner, who used to mock me when I used to believe in my obscure religion....before I learned it was all bull.
BTW> Yes, I will admit that I've tried drugs, (I used to be a "crack junkie", you could say), but I actually haven't touched anything in quite a while. Not even booze.
Can you really say you've never tried anything? Ever?
And cigarettes have been proven to be more addictive and more unhealthy than most illegal drugs, and yet millions of people across the world use them daily. Do you mock them as well?
Actually no, i'm not stupid enough to try something like that. I don't care if people do them, infact I think it should be legal but no I don't do them.
And now I KNOW you're liberal cause you're actually dumb enough to believe cocaine is no worse then ciggerates. Yes, because ciggerates can make your heart explode and go impotent on the first puff. What a comparison. -_ -;
Obviously the man was lieing when he said drugs kill.
Your a perfect example of it's failure to comply.
Ok....
All I said was that cigarettes are more addictive than most "illegal drugs", and that the governments willingly sell them, make billions, and tell you that other drugs are bad.
Personally, I don't consider myself liberal, but whatever. I hate politics. I'd rather a Utopian society, but meh, it'll never happen. I guess you might start calling me a dirty Commie now....🙄
Sense you're Canadian i'm going to let you slide sense you don't know how our country works, let me enlighten you.
The goverment treats smokers like second-class citizens.
Our society treats smokers worse then animals.
Therfore the tobbacco industry is not exactly a thriving buisness to market in.
The REAL money is in Hollywood, how Americans in general give idol worship to Paris Hilton and her fake boobies or George Clooney and his bad acting. How SNL makes horrible HORRIBLE skits because they've become so damn liberal that they've forgotten how to be funny.. Which is why Comedy Central gaveup on thier douche asses. (And it's not cause they're bias cause they keep the daily show, and even John Stewart sucks, the only exseption to a un-funny liberal is Joe Black.)
And the utopian society could work if my plan was put into action.
Although first 70% of the world's population would have to die. You included..
#1: It has to do with my scientific theory you idgit. 4/10 people are "red guys" the rest are "blue guys". You are a blue guy. Therfore for MY utopia to exsist you must die.
10% of my "red guys" must die because they have been brainwashed sense the beggeining of time to not realize this obvious ying-yang of peoples, thier compassion makes them weak, and inevitably if I leave them alive they will turn to "blue guys" thus resulting in the blue population growing rapidly because more reds will be hesitant to kill blues and we'll be right back where we ****ing started!