Bill O'rielly gets made a fool of

Started by PVS21 pages

Originally posted by mr.smiley
That's not core.

The bottom line is Oreily did stumble,but that was once out of a lot of interviews.I've seen maybe three times I think someone got the better of him

its an exchange of ideas, not a competition or sport.
that is why oreilly cant debate and why you just dont understand the
meaning of a debate. one may come out with better points and their ideas may shine above the other's, but that is for the viewer to decide.

just covering your ears and saying "IM RIGHT!!! YOUR WRONG!!! NOW I CANT HEAR YOU!!! LALALALALALALALALALALLALALALA!!!!" is just the act of silencing your opponent. i would think the opponent 'wins' by default since oreilly makes himself look like a baboon 😬

Originally posted by mr.smiley
People see what they want to see

obviously. 🙄

bill o reily is a git

Originally posted by Deano
i dont take no notice

thats a double negative, so i guess you DO take notice 😛

edit: oh i see how it is! someone needs to take your edit button away!

Originally posted by PVS
thats a double negative, so i guess you DO take notice 😛

edit: oh i see how it is! someone needs to take your edit button away!

maybe...but then again...maybe not 😄

I think Oreily is a good man that has good ideas.I strongly agree with him on the american/mexican border and I also agree Florida has a huge problem with letting child molseters loose

im too quick for you boy 😛

Originally posted by mr.smiley
I strongly agree with him on the american/mexican border...

yes, i agree with the boarder as well. gotta have one, or how will anyone tell where the u.s. ends and mexico begins?

Originally posted by mr.smiley
and I also agree Florida has a huge problem with letting child molseters loose

wtf is a molseter?

We don't have a border anymore!

child "molester"

I think thats how it's spelled

its an insect i think pvs

Originally posted by Deano
its an insect i think pvs

that's sick man.

Originally posted by mr.smiley
that's sick man.

i was just playing along with the joke that you spelt molester wrong
chill goddamn out brother

ha 😛

🙂

Originally posted by BackFire
haha, O'Reily's inability to debate with any validity is even more obviously when you read what he says in text form.

Exactly what I was thinking.

Originally posted by PVS
O'REILLY: In the "Personal Stories" segment tonight, we were surprised to find out than an American who lost his father in the World Trade Center attack had signed an anti-war advertisement that accused the USA itself of terrorism. The offending passage read, "We too watched with shock the horrific events of September 11... we too mourned the thousands of innocent dead and shook our heads at the terrible scenes of carnage -- even as we recalled similar scenes in Baghdad, Panama City, and a generation ago, Vietnam." With us now is Jeremy Glick, whose father, Barry, was a Port Authority worker at the Trade Center. Mr. Glick is a co-author of the book "Another World is Possible." I'm surprised you signed this. You were the only one of all of the families who signed...

JEREMY GLICK: Well, actually, that's not true.

O'REILLY: Who signed the advertisement?

GLICK: Peaceful Tomorrow, which represents 9/11 families, were also involved.

O'REILLY: Hold it, hold it, hold it, Jeremy. You're the only one who signed this advertisement.

GLICK: As an individual.

O'REILLY: Yes, as -- with your name. You were the only one. I was surprised, and the reason I was surprised is that this ad equates the United States with the terrorists. And I was offended by that.

GLICK: Well, you say -- I remember earlier you said it was a moral equivalency, and it's actually a material equivalency. And just to back up for a second about your surprise, I'm actually shocked that you're surprised. If you think about it, our current president, who I feel and many feel is in this position illegitimately by neglecting the voices of Afro- Americans in the Florida coup, which, actually, somebody got impeached for during the Reconstruction period -- Our current president now inherited a legacy from his father and inherited a political legacy that's responsible for training militarily, economically, and situating geopolitically the parties involved in the alleged assassination and the murder of my father and countless of thousands of others. So I don't see why it's surprising...

O'REILLY: All right. Now let me stop you here. So...

GLICK: ... for you to think that I would come back and want to support...

O'REILLY: It is surprising, and I'll tell you why. I'll tell you why it's surprising.

GLICK: ... escalating...

O'REILLY: You are mouthing a far left position that is a marginal position in this society, which you're entitled to.

GLICK: It's marginal -- right.

O'REILLY: You're entitled to it, all right, but you're -- you see, even -- I'm sure your beliefs are sincere, but what upsets me is I don't think your father would be approving of this.

GLICK: Well, actually, my father thought that Bush's presidency was illegitimate.

O'REILLY: Maybe he did, but...

GLICK: I also didn't think that Bush...

O'REILLY: ... I don't think he'd be equating this country as a terrorist nation as you are.

GLICK: Well, I wasn't saying that it was necessarily like that.

O'REILLY: Yes, you are. You signed...

GLICK: What I'm saying is...

O'REILLY: ... this, and that absolutely said that.

GLICK: ... is that in -- six months before the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan, starting in the Carter administration and continuing and escalating while Bush's father was head of the CIA, we recruited a hundred thousand radical mujahadeens to combat a democratic government in Afghanistan, the Turaki government.

O'REILLY: All right. I don't want to...

GLICK: Maybe...

O'REILLY: I don't want to debate world politics with you.

GLICK: Well, why not? This is about world politics.

O'REILLY: Because, No. 1, I don't really care what you think.

GLICK: Well, OK.

O'REILLY: You're -- I want to...

GLICK: But you do care because you...

O'REILLY: No, no. Look...

GLICK: The reason why you care is because you evoke 9/11...

O'REILLY: Here's why I care.

GLICK: ... to rationalize...

O'REILLY: Here's why I care...

GLICK: Let me finish. You evoke 9/11 to rationalize everything from domestic plunder to imperialistic aggression worldwide.

O'REILLY: OK. That's a bunch...

GLICK: You evoke sympathy with the 9/11 families.

O'REILLY: That's a bunch of crap. I've done more for the 9/11 families by their own admission -- I've done more for them than you will ever hope to do.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: So you keep your mouth shut when you sit here exploiting those people.

GLICK: Well, you're not representing me. You're not representing me.

O'REILLY: And I'd never represent you. You know why?

GLICK: Why?

O'REILLY: Because you have a warped view of this world and a warped view of this country.

GLICK: Well, explain that. Let me give you an example of a parallel...

O'REILLY: No, I'm not going to debate this with you, all right.

GLICK: Well, let me give you an example of parallel experience. On September 14...

O'REILLY: No, no. Here's -- here's the...

GLICK: On September 14...

O'REILLY: Here's the record.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: All right. You didn't support the action against Afghanistan to remove the Taliban. You were against it, OK.

GLICK: Why would I want to brutalize and further punish the people in Afghanistan...

O'REILLY: Who killed your father!

GLICK: The people in Afghanistan...

O'REILLY: Who killed your father.

GLICK: ... didn't kill my father.

O'REILLY: Sure they did. The al Qaeda people were trained there.

GLICK: The al Qaeda people? What about the Afghan people?

O'REILLY: See, I'm more angry about it than you are!

GLICK: So what about George Bush?

O'REILLY: What about George Bush? He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: The director -- senior as director of the CIA.

O'REILLY: He had nothing to do with it.

GLICK: So the people that trained a hundred thousand Mujahadeen who were...

O'REILLY: Man, I hope your mom isn't watching this.

GLICK: Well, I hope she is.

O'REILLY: I hope your mother is not watching this because you -- that's it. I'm not going to say anymore.

GLICK: OK.

O'REILLY: In respect for your father...

GLICK: On September 14, do you want to know what I'm doing?

O'REILLY: Shut up. Shut up.

GLICK: Oh, please don't tell me to shut up.

O'REILLY: As respect -- as respect -- in respect for your father, who was a Port Authority worker, a fine American, who got killed unnecessarily by barbarians...

GLICK: By radical extremists who were trained by this government...

O'REILLY: Out of respect for him...

GLICK: ... not the people of America.

O'REILLY: ... I'm not going to...

GLICK: ... The people of the ruling class, the small minority.

O'REILLY: Cut his mic. I'm not going to dress you down anymore, out of respect for your father. We will be back in a moment with more of THE FACTOR.

GLICK: That means we're done?

O'REILLY: We're done.

Mr. Smiley. We can debate the politics of Bill O'Rielly all day, however, this post illustrates why he wants the "weakest" links as guests on his show. Look at this conversation! When he starts loosing he resorts to name calling, crying about how it's "my show" and turning off his guest microphone. Then, to garner support for people like yourself he wraps it all up by saying "out of respect for your father".

Which is really just implying that "I respect the victims of 9/11, and look at you...you're the son of a victim and because you're a liberal you don't respect your father or the others who died!"

And mister Glick was right. O'Rielly and the people he proclaims to speak for, use 9/11 to evoke sympathy and anger so they can advance their own agenda and ignorant points of view.

That time O'Reilly really did get schooled. How's he gonna say "I'm not going to debate politics with you" on a supposedly political show? And the he says he doesn't care what he thinks.. if he doesn't care what he thinks then why the hell did he invite him to his show? What a moron.

I'm neutral on this, O Reilly is my hero but I too KNOW this war is a shame. The only reason I don't ***** like the liberals is cause Saddam was a bastard. Evil versus Evil I say..

I thought you liked evil? First you admit that the war is a shame, then you call Saddam "evil," you're getting soft on us aren't you?

Your mom is getting soft.