Moron

Amazon.com is the best place to find reviews by people who don't know jack shit.

*********************************************************
1 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

Not good, May 30, 2005
Reviewer: C. Nielsen (Orange Park, FL) - See all my reviews

Revenge of the Sith was a mixed bag. The fact that it was able to tie into the original Star Wars was satisfying, but that was about the only thing I found satisfying in the movie. Most of it was boring. The script was atrocious. Lucas continued to make the same kinds of mistakes that I thought he made in the last two movies.

Yoda played too big of a role.
Dooku is a stupid name. So is Grievous.
Jar Jar Binks appeared in a couple of scenes.
Lucas showed altogether too many creatures and people and flying ships. The sparseness of the original Star Wars is what captured my imagination about the movie. Lucas failed again to realize this and destroyed the most interesting thing about the original Star Wars.
The "Force" was demystified by "mitochlorians" or whatever they were called.
There were far too many BORING light saber battles. All they are is glorified sword fighting using light sabers which are not novel anymore. You've seen one of these fight scenes, you've seen them all, and there were far too many of them in this movie.
The attempts to weave modern day politics into the script and the philosophical statements coming out of Yoda's mouth were stupid.
Too many new inventions. So in the original Star Wars, technology actually decreased?
Uncomfortable, melodramatic "giving birth" scene, along with awkward dialog.
Ewen McGregor and Sam Jackson and Natalie Portman were all miscast. They should have gone with unknown actors. The fact that these actors are so well recognized detracts from the appeal and the immersiveness of the Star Wars universe.
Why were there so many "Clones" in the first three movies, but none in the original three movies?
I don't think George Lucas is a good director. Anyone else could have made a better prequel trilogy for Star Wars. Everything that was good about the original trilogy has been stripped away and replaced with heartless, visionless filler. **************************************************************

Yeah, in 1998 everyone knew who Natalie Portman and Ewan Mcgregor were.

ALL HAIL DIPSHITS!!!!!!!

quote"Why were there so many "Clones" in the first three movies, but none in the original three movies? "quote

there were clones in the original 3

"There were too many *boring* lightsaber fights...."

Doofus, there were few light saber fights in the original because all the Jedi were f*cking dead! Obi-Wan and Yoda were the last of the Jedi. Luke and Vader (and I suppose Sidious) were the final students of the ancient use of the lightsaber as a weapon.

Uncomfortable birth scene? Duuuh! She was dying asswipe...feel a little uncomfortable now?

Have to agree with that birth scene it sucked

✅

I've liked if Lucas directed Ep1, Cameron Ep2 and Burton Ep3 🙂

Originally posted by Fishy
Have to agree with that birth scene it sucked

oooba,oooba

The guy is whining about NAMES? Too much action in EpIII and he can't take it.

I don't think I've ever said this about anything before..but Luke and Leia were adorable little babies. 😗

That is all bullsh*t, People do too much crack

Originally posted by OB1-adobe
Yeah, in 1998 everyone knew who Natalie Portman and Ewan Mcgregor were.

To be fair, people knew McGregor from Shallow Grave (1994), Trainspotting (1996), Brassed Off (1996), Nightwatch (1996) and A Life Less Ordinary (1997), among others.

Portman had become fairly famous in Léon aka The Professional (1994).

At least to myself, they were anything but "unknown actors".

Then again, most of these films were successes in England and Europe, so they probably were fairly unknown in America...

Ewan wasnt too big in America then, not sure about Natalie.

I don't remember knowing anything about either of them, and furthermore on the matters of Mace Windu for example being well known, Lucas did cast some well knowns in OT for various roles

Billy Dee Williams, Sir Alec Guiness, Harrison Ford was not well known but neither was unknown, Peter Cushing...

I wanna kick his ****ing face !!!!!!

Casting unknowns isn't always a good decision. Take the new Superman for example..he doesn't look like a Superman. He can't be played by some lame little pretty boy actor..the job should've went to someone who resembled Alex Ross's Superman. He is the REAL Superman.

Originally posted by Delta 62
Casting unknowns isn't always a good decision. Take the new Superman for example..he doesn't look like a Superman. He can't be played by some lame little pretty boy actor..the job should've went to someone who resembled Alex Ross's Superman. He is the REAL Superman.

Oh god yes, I hate the way the new so called Superman looks.

Spielberg - Episode I ( works great with movies about kids and sci-fantasy)

Cameron - Episode II ( really dynamic battle scenes, begins to get dark,
knows how to get decent performances from "B" actors (Lance Henriksen, Arnold, Sigourney Weaver).

Bryan Singer - Episode III (can work with multiple characters, handles emotional scenes well, has worked with effects, dynamic fight scenes)

aaaahhhh, what could have been!

Did any of you know that Lucas approached Spielberg and Ron Howard (Coccoon, Apollo 13) before TPM and asked them if they wanted to direct the PT? They both told him he should get back in the directors chair and make his movies). faintthud

^^^^good choice of directors^^^^

lol...im not even going to comment on this guys review...

his points are not even legitimate points, just him whining about things like names....wtf..

meh whatever...

HEY IM DRUNK EVERYBODY!!!

😱

dumbass review too

I agree with the technology part.