who has more raw power
in terms of raw force power, who had more, anakin or luke? i know anakin in ep 3 could trash luke in a fight, but luke hadnt even seen a lightsaber until he was 17. and then he had a teacher that was killed shortly after he started training. assuming luke 1st saw obi wans ghost on hoth, luke had no further training until me met yoda, who he didnt have long with before he went to cloud city. when he fought vader there it was clear vader was alot stronger, but hed had his whole life to train. and even at the end when vader got serious luke was still able to get in a glancing blow to his shoulder. then in rotj luke decimated vader once vader threatened liea. i know it was a surprise attack, and had vader managed to reorient himself it wouldnt have been so quick, but id say luke would still have defeated him. my question is, if luke and anakin had been trained since birth with the same oppertunities who would have been stronger. vader is said to have 80% the power of anakin and luke proved himself to be too much for vader, so would the extra 20% compensate for an extra almost 2 decades of training for luke? also, does vader have 80% of anakins strength when he was cut up in episode 3, of 80% of his potential power? the emperor said that vader would become stronger than either himself or yoda, so is it 80% of that power, or 80% of his power while he was still young? i know there is some eu stuff that has to do with this like obi wan helping luke defeat vader before hoth, but im talking soley in terms of the movies, the 100% cannon. who was stronger?