Padme in 'love'

Started by Jedikahuna3 pages

Oh man I need to find a place for "real" Star Wars fans what do you kids know about these movies. you the acting was stiff and sloppy but go back and watch the original (before it was called a new hope"😉 in 1977 a movie came out that was cheesie wit poor acting and unbelievable FX and changed the way I look at movies Nay the way the world looks at movies. and this one joined the two sets of movies together a feat that I would have bet agents they have to have the romance it goes along with the other emotions that make up the dark side.

Great... it's been established that the film has great effects and revolutionized the effects in films... Ok... so does that mean the dialogue and direction has to suck... um, no.

You dont need to be defensive... 99.9% people in here are fans of the movies... there's nothing wrong with analyzing them and pointing out their (glaringly obvious) flaws

That flaw runs in the whole series.

I agree

Yeah...quit complaining about the acting in the prequels,
the acting really wasn't much better in the original trilogy.
but star wars isnt'about the acting.
it's about the great story!

And all those people complaining about cgi, I really need to ask them for a better way of doing what was done in the films.
-10,000 battledroids in stop motion?
-Yoda puppet looking real good while figting?
-All those clone trooopers in stop motion as well?
-Do a whole coruscant miniature and use stop motion for the traffic going past?
If you tihnk this cgi is bad, go and see superman 2...

Padme's acting isn't what botherred me, it was something else......

I dunno about you guys, but Padme got fat.

Originally posted by ArynCrinn
Yeah...quit complaining about the acting in the prequels,
the acting really wasn't much better in the original trilogy.
but star wars isnt'about the acting.
it's about the great story!

And all those people complaining about cgi, I really need to ask them for a better way of doing what was done in the films.
-10,000 battledroids in stop motion?
-Yoda puppet looking real good while figting?
-All those clone trooopers in stop motion as well?
-Do a whole coruscant miniature and use stop motion for the traffic going past?
If you tihnk this cgi is bad, go and see superman 2...

Why do people act so defensive and try to compare the movies to something in hopes that it looks better... why cant you just accept that the movies aren't perfect

on this board its all about "the acting isnt that bad .. go look at the original trilogy .. wut piece of crap acting that was" or "cummon the cgi isnt that bad.. go look at scooby doo"

Originally posted by Red Superfly
Padme's acting isn't what botherred me, it was something else......

I dunno about you guys, but Padme got fat.

😆

As for those of you saying that the acting sucked all the way through the orginal trilogy, I disagree. I think that Harrison did an awesome job and his comedic timing was great.

But...you're missing my point. I'm not saying her acting was bad, it has nothing to do with that. I just don't her 'acting' the way she did in rots is credible to her as Queen Amadala. Although some brought up the point that obviously she isn't going to act the same in her personal life.

I suppose I just thought that who she was when she was Queen was who she was characteristicly, you know, like her integrity and class wasn't just a show when she was in her Queen get-up.

She deserved more class than 'I love you more ani' type chit.

Sarah 😉

Well...
why does everyone have to complain about cgi or acting?
I'd like to see them do better!
I have nothing against the films

And I don't think anyone said that all the acting was bad in the original trilogy

Also as a 14 year old girl, being queen would require a person to "act" like a queen.
They way she speaks throughout the movies as just normal padmé is quite different to when she is speaking as senator or queen.
Just look at when she is cleanin artoo and talking to jar jar, or on tatooine with little anakin in episode 1.
People speak differently when they are in different situations.

And why does everyone complain about dialogue?
Do you fully understand the many different cultures in star wars and the many different ways that each of them speak?
And do you really have a complete understanding of the characters?

and as for the directing...
I really don't know what's wrong with that.

My real problem with episode 3, is that is was too short.
It made everything seem so rushed.

On the dialogue:

George knows he's not a great writer... He doesn't care because he tells the story through visuals and music, not dialogue...

From The Making of Star Wars Revenge of the Sith:

Lucas: "... If you're just cutting dialogue, it doesn't matter; it's just talking heads and the emphasis is all on the dialogue. But in my films, the dialogue is not where the movie is. My films are basically in the graphics. The emotional impact come from the music - and from juxtaposing one image with the next."