Originally posted by Swanky-TunaTrue...But is Peter Parker was Born with those powers He'd be a Mutant and SHOULD go by the name as Man-Spider. But even if his Genetic make up is all screwed from the Spider He should still be called Man-Spider. The only time he should be called Spiderman is when He has his Metal Mechcancal web-shooters. But once again I will say....Take this Bull crap up with Sam and Stan.
I've never seen somebody complain about something as petty webshooters. Usually it something about the character's personality.
Originally posted by Spideys Sister
True...But is Peter Parker was Born with those powers He'd be a Mutant and SHOULD go by the name as Man-Spider. But even if his Genetic make up is all screwed from the Spider He should still be called Man-Spider. The only time he should be called Spiderman is when He has his Metal Mechcancal web-shooters. But once again I will say....Take this Bull crap up with Sam and Stan.
The organic webbing and tiny hairs are just there so the audience doesn't have to sit through Pete inventing the webshooters and explaining he sticks to walls electromagnetically or whatever. Who would he explain this stuff to?
Originally posted by Swanky-TunaMutants are discribed as People BORN with thier powers. Spiderman isn't. He's classified as an illgal genectic mutation. Read ultimate Spiderman vol.9 I know everything about those issuses.
I think you should sit down for this. Spiderman... was always a mutant. Whether he has organic webbing or webshooters, he was mutated by that spider. Thing, Flash, Hulk, Mr. Sinister, all technically mutants.The organic webbing and tiny hairs are just there so the audience doesn't have to sit through Pete inventing the webshooters and explaining he sticks to walls electromagnetically or whatever. Who would he explain this stuff to?
Originally posted by Swanky-Tuna
I think you should sit down for this. Spiderman... was always a mutant. Whether he has organic webbing or webshooters, he was mutated by that spider. Thing, Flash, Hulk, Mr. Sinister, all technically mutants.The organic webbing and tiny hairs are just there so the audience doesn't have to sit through Pete inventing the webshooters and explaining he sticks to walls electromagnetically or whatever. Who would he explain this stuff to?
errr no.The comics clearly classifys him as the NON mutunt Superhero.Now he is a mutant so this movie betrays his character.
and the way you get around him explaining that is he doesnt talk to anybody about it,where this movie failed as a spidey film was we should have heard his thoughts like in the comics and 90's cartoon where he would think to himself.With superman and batman,you dont need a movie to hear their thoughts.But spidey is a unique and different case.His appeal has always been that people could relate to him because we always got to hear his thoughts what he was thinking to himself which is what we do everyday in our lives so thats how you get around that is they should have had him thinking to himself and we get to listen to his thoughts.that totally sucked that they did not inlcude that in the movie. 😠
Originally posted by Mr Parker
errr no.The comics clearly classifys him as the NON mutunt Superhero.
Now he is a mutant so this movie betrays his character.
I mean, both comic and movie Spidey are technically mutants. I'm just asking why you say movie Spiderman is a mutant. and the way you get around him explaining that is he doesnt talk to anybody about it,where this movie failed as a spidey film was we should have heard his thoughts like in the comics and 90's cartoon where he would think to himself.With superman and batman,you dont need a movie to hear their thoughts.But spidey is a unique and different case.His appeal has always been that people could relate to him because we always got to hear his thoughts what he was thinking to himself which is what we do everyday in our lives so thats how you get around that is they should have had him thinking to himself and we get to listen to his thoughts.that totally sucked that they did not inlcude that in the movie. 😠
Heavy "thought dialogue" would of made the movie crappy though.
For the most part, we can already tell what Pete is thinking from the body language and expressions in the movie and you can already tell he's an average joe from the condition of his life. Going into his pro-dork skills in making the webshooters, why he went with the spider theme, and the nature of his sticking powers would of either been rushed or eaten up time that could be used on the plot.
No it wouldnt have.This movie was complete crap anyway and that would have saved it from being crap.People would have seen what a unique character he was because of that.This movie was ajoke because at the end credits they played the 60's theme song of spiderman spiderman,radioactive spiderman.what the hell? there was no radioactive spider in that movie so why the hell was that theme in the song.wrong movie for that theme to be in. 🙄 I t wouldnt have taken more than a two minute montage sequence to include the webshooters in the film which is crucial for his character to have.without the webshooters,he's just an ordinary Joe that you never get to see his scientific genuis demonstated..
and you can hardly tell what his exact thoughts are.Forever the apologists.