Lois Lane should not have a biological child in the new Superman Returns movie.

Lois Lane having a child in Superman Returns movie is a problem for that movie and future Superman movies. I like Bryan Singer as a director but if this of all movies come out wrong I do not what to hear his name in a action movie again also the next Superman movie would have to be call Superman Begins. Super hero movie should always be true to the comic books.

If this is true why is WB allowing this happen they of all people should know how to not make a bad super hero movie.

Please Bryan Singer use the comic books for help.
😠

Originally posted by BB_hawk
Lois Lane having a child in Superman Returns movie is a problem for that movie and future Superman movies. I like Bryan Singer as a director but if this of all movies come out wrong I do not what to hear his name in a action movie again also the next Superman movie would have to be call Superman Begins. Super hero movie should always be true to the comic books.

If this is true why is WB allowing this happen they of all people should know how to not make a bad super hero movie.

Please Bryan Singer use the comic books for help.
😠

they gonna have a super boy...or a super girl how sweet...but I could see problems with this too bro.

Originally posted by BB_hawk
Please Bryan Singer use the comic books for help.

Which comic books?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Which comic books?

god help us.

What I should have said was that the child was Lois and Richard White nephew of Perry White.

been there... done that... Lonna already had a kid in Superman 3. Lois doesn't need children because you just lost the tension between Superman and his love. Brett Ratner needs to stick to what he knows. A goofy black man and a chung kind cop. He's made alot of money off of Rush hour. Start working on 3 and leave Superman alone.

No Lois should not have a child.

Superman is one sicko...dressing up his two year kids as little images of himself.

The child should be Clark's instead of Richard's.

Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Superman is one sicko...dressing up his two year kids as little images of himself.

Offering batman a gun duel to the death was funny, but snapping Lois's air tube because she wouldn't marry him? What a dick.

I'm not sure if he's killed her more often, or married her more often . . .

rush hour 3 was cancelled, so ratner is free to spoil x-men...

as a superman fan i feel so f*cked over that singer is doing superman returns...

Originally posted by pr1983
rush hour 3 was cancelled, so ratner is free to spoil x-men...

as a superman fan i feel so f*cked over that singer is doing superman returns...

i thought you'd never said that.... man, this is so f@cked, who the heck picked bryan singer??? apparently WB doesn't wanna challenge MARVEL, they just wanna destroy superheros, what a bunch of j..., can't believe all i read here. i just wanna go to another planet, or pretend this never happened, on the other hand, let this guy bring superman down, so the next superman movie we watch will look even bigger. i don't know what i am saying anymore, i am just so mad and disappointed. 🙁

What if I tell you that there was a new rumor out there about the child and it was Superman child and that the kid don't have super powers what so ever. I still think it shouldn't be because it would make Superman more soft.

http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html

'nuff said

Originally posted by Creshosk
Which comic books?

LOL LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Supes' son in the undies without the tights looks really really wrong.....

I think that the child may ACTUALLY be Superman's.cough Lois and Clark had sex in Superman II cough

^^^^^^ comeon thats was pretty obvious... and we all know Supes didn't have protection on him in the Fortress of Solitude ^^^^^^

finally some people feel like me! i went and saw this crap yesterday and hated the movie after clues were being dropped that jason was the son of superman. WTF? superman should not have a friggin kid. that destroyed the whole movie. please either get a new director producer or erase this movie and say it was a dream before they destroy superman even more. i also thought that this made superman look weak especially when he basically "died".

Originally posted by alexanderluthor
i thought you'd never said that.... man, this is so f@cked, who the heck picked bryan singer??? apparently WB doesn't wanna challenge MARVEL, they just wanna destroy superheros, what a bunch of j..., can't believe all i read here. i just wanna go to another planet, or pretend this never happened, on the other hand, let this guy bring superman down, so the next superman movie we watch will look even bigger. i don't know what i am saying anymore, i am just so mad and disappointed. 🙁

Dr. Zaius agrees with you on all following matters of interpretation:

1) Your anger and disappointment over the poor quality of the film.

2) Your incredulity that a major motion picture studio could make such staggeringly bad decisions with a major film property.

3) Your growing dislike for Bryan Singer.

4) Your disbelief at the blind fan loyalty on this board towards an obviously bad portrayal of their beloved character.

5) Your selection of a clearly superior Superman actor in the jpeg image below your comments.

Congratulations on your superior taste and judgment.

What then...diabolical?

Originally posted by darkthoughtbox
been there... done that... Lonna already had a kid in Superman 3. Lois doesn't need children because you just lost the tension between Superman and his love. Brett Ratner needs to stick to what he knows. A goofy black man and a chung kind cop. He's made alot of money off of Rush hour. Start working on 3 and leave Superman alone.

No Lois should not have a child.

I think you're confused. Ratner directed X3, not Superman.