criticism of mainstream media
i thought i'd look at the topic from a different angle...many people seem intent on criticising the mainstream media in the US and the UK from both sides of the political divide
on the one hand you have the lefties attacking the mainstream media for covering up or not holding their governments to account enough over things such as the war in iraq
one such person being Michael Moore
Moore takes it upon himself to denounce Bush as evil and his films and interviews, while interesting, aren't really bastions of journalistic integrity
but rather than criticise moore for the subjects he chooses to attack...what gets me annoyed is that his subjects are relatively easy to attack
its easy to focus on a government you believe to be corrupt when the investigations you carry out are done so in relative safety
why doesn't moore do a film about the corruption and scandals of say the Sudanese government or Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe?
could it be that these kind of investigations are simply to difficult to focus on...
it is in situations like these that the only people who seem willing to put themselves in harms way to get the story out is the journalists from the mainstream media
a prime example beign Frank Gardner of the BBC who went unescorted into an area of Saudi Arabia where it was rumoured to be a stronghold for al queda operatives...he was dragged from the car and shot 6 times at point blank range and left to die...fortunately he survived
Moore has heavily criticised the war in iraq yet i dont recall him ever doing any frontline investigations in the pursuit of his story
its easy to find failings and criticisms of the mainstream media when we have access to the internet and other sources
but lets try and keep some perspective on the fact that in 2004 , 129 journalists were killed trying to get the stories we all "have a right to know" about
its very easy to criticise while sitting at a computer