Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
Wolverine movie wise, was the weakest link, but was more accurate in some senses, as was spidey
Batman doesn't have the high tech gadgets of his comic counterpart and while he has a massive skill advantage it isn't enough to save him. Bruce can't engage either Spider-man or Wolverine in a physical confrontation and hope to stay in the game for long and he doesn't have anything to put either of them down.
It'd be hard for Batman to take out Spidey, but it's still possible. His fighting skills absolutely dwarf Spider-Man's, but Peter's got the strength and the endurance to roll with it. The only way for Bats to win is to get a hold of him (which will be difficult) and break his bones.
Wolverine is a tough one. His only advantages are the claws, his healing factor, and his bones. His fighting skills aren't on par with Batman's, but I can't think of how Logan would stay down for very long.
Wolverine. would be the easily avoided, and spiderman and wolverine are the most lethal if they get too close. Spidreman did all kinds of crazy feats in the movie, I think he could dodge wolverine's attacks and bats very easily, but would be suspect to gadgets as well.
Wolverine's healing factor in the movies were closer to his normal self, and would play no sufficient obstacle to spiderman, and not bats either.
Batman has the most justified reason to fight. Plus the movie just f'ing rocked. Spidey and Wolvie recognize each other so they'll kill each other first. Batman will then hide in the shadows, see through their little techniques, and then beat them.
Dr. Jonathan Crane: He's here.
Henchman: Who?
Dr. Jonathan Crane: The Bat-man.
Its not who I am that matters..but WHAT I DO..that defines me.
Batman > Spidey > Wolvie