Two-Face in part 2

He's too old... then again, he's doing Indy jones 4! But... I think a black Harvey would suck balls! Does that make me racist?

no, doesn't make you a racist...I actually never was sure if he was black or white, cause I think I saw him as both...that's why harvey dent in the first batman was black...I think it would be cool to have a black villian, altho it's not that important to me...if you think a white harvey dent would be more accurate and you say that a black one would suck balls then...then no, you're not a rascist

It's just I like films to stay loyal and... I've always wondered what the f**k Burton was doing when he had Lando Dent become DA

If Harvey were to be black then I'd like Denzel Washington. Too well known, but I'd pick him over Sam Jackon.

That's who that artist dude based his pic of 2 face on...

Ohh yeah? Looked pretty good. That just makes me feel even better about it then.

But he should be WHITE...

Oh I know...it's probably even likely he'll be white.

It's RIGHT if he's white...

I would have Vincent D'Onofrio for Harvey Dent/Two-Face- he'd be the perfect choice in my opinion.

Who?

I don't think they should have Two-Face as a main character in the sequel. This is cos the two characters of Joker and Two-Face are very similar. They should introduce Harvey Dent and then develop the character in the films that follow and keep BB2 for the Joker cos he has to be the main villain for the whole film.

Two face in BB3... and he is NOT very similar to joker... you just watch BF, thats your problemo!

Originally posted by Knightfall93
Two face in BB3... and he is NOT very similar to joker... you just watch BF, thats your problemo!

Yeah, personality and comic book way Two face is not similar to Joker but visually, you have to say that the characters do slightly LOOK similar. No matter what the two face character is going to be compared to the BF Two face so thats why i said to develop the character in BB2, in order for him to have the impact the character deserves. ........ BF might not be the best movie in the world to say the least and i'l be the first person to say Schumacher should never be allowed anywhere near a batman script BUT going back to the other thread about Schumachers films bombing in order for good batman films to be produced.... would we have had nolans batman without shumachers??

err... that's like saying "would we have Spiderman 1 and 2 if not for the crappy 70s film" orb "would we have Singers X Men without the animated series?" It's illogical BULL SHIT!

Originally posted by Knightfall93
err... that's like saying "would we have Spiderman 1 and 2 if not for the crappy 70s film" orb "would we have Singers X Men without the animated series?" It's illogical BULL SHIT!

I MEANT big hollywood films! A movie is always going to be compared to whats come before it if its got the same characters especially something like Batman. Who's talking about animated series and stuff like that... thats completly different!

No, you didnt listen to my pint though, did you, Forever Guy?

oh I heard your point but think your the one MISSING the point!

No, Im arguing AGAINST your pint, little boy... you evidently dont understand an argument!

Im not disputing your arguing AGAINST my point, i wouldn't be replying if you were agreeing! All im saying is that a new Two face character would be compared against the old one, that was my original point!!!! Regarding BF and Nolan, even though BB was a REBOOT as u put it, u cant say that as a sequence Nolan didn't look at what has come before him and looked at what he shouldn't do in order for his film to be a success.