Why? Because it's the truth, and you don't feel the need to acknowledge it, so you can claim that the Moderators are acting on these stupid ****ing vendettas you've came to assume all along?
Grow up. The guy did it to himself, and there have been plenty of "reasons" as to why he was banned. It's seriously not worth all this drama.
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Why? Because it's the truth, and you don't feel the need to acknowledge it, so you can claim that the Moderators are acting on these stupid ****ing vendettas you've came to assume all along?Grow up. The guy did it to himself, and there have been plenty of "reasons" as to why he was banned. It's seriously not worth all this drama.
I have not ''accused'' the mods of anything,I personally do not have a problem with storm,but I have a right to say my opinion and I say the ban was simply unfair.(not a lot) but IT was a little....
Originally posted by kmcdude
I have not ''accused'' the mods of anything,I personally do not have a problem with storm,but I have a right to say my opinion and I say the ban was simply unfair.(not a lot) but IT was a little....
How so? Can you explain giving logic and reasoning as to what exactly was unfair about it?
Originally posted by kmcdude
I have not ''accused'' the mods of anything,I personally do not have a problem with storm,but I have a right to say my opinion and I say the ban was simply unfair.(not a lot) but IT was a little....
...and then one of the mod's who did not like him gets a chance to ban him and he is gone and even though the majority of off topic wants him back as it is the MEMBERS thate make the forum,cause STORM banned him forever there is sadly nothing us ''NO SAY IN IT'' members can do about it,cause one person did not like him laughing out loud Which sadly had to be a mod
If that's not an assumption, neigh, an ALLEGATION, I don't know what is. You're suggesting Storm acted on a personal vendetta against SlipknoT, when all she did was her job.
You do indeed have a right to an opinion, but given your opinion is wrong in that you can't prove his ban was unfair, and we can prove that it was, it's virtually nullified, thus not worth arguing anymore.
Totally fair.
Originally posted by BackFire
How so? Can you explain giving logic and reasoning as to what exactly was unfair about it?
Okay here it goes.......
1. Slip claimed in a thread ''storm'' had never liked him and that's why he was banned for 3 days and he did not even know what he did wrong!
2. I have honestly seen more offensive threads than slip's ''laughable'' ''poop poop'' one and I know that there was no way in the WORLD he would have thought he would get banned ''permantly'' for that......I mean I honestly cant understand it..............and I were a mod on a horror combined with off topic forum for 3 years 😖
Originally posted by kmcdude
Okay here it goes.......1. Slip claimed in a thread ''storm'' had never liked him and that's why he was banned for 3 days and he did not even know what he did wrong!
2. I have honestly seen more offensive threads than slip's ''laughable'' ''poop poop'' one and I know that there was no way in the WORLD he would have thought he would get banned ''permantly'' for that......I mean I honestly cant understand it..............and I were a mod on a horror combined with off topic forum for 3 years 😖
He was banned for 3 days because of his flooding the OTF with ridiculous nonsense and vulgar threads. He was warned by Storm, and I believe another mod. I reported some of his threads as well. He knew damn well what he did wrong, which were threads including revoltingly graphic topics such as consuming feces, and asking who liked to hold a lighter to their "cock", "penis", and "balls".
He did it MORE than once, not only that, the threads about beating up underclassmen, coming on here starting threads about being drunk, threads with one word in the rely, vulgarity and obscenities galore...we weren't going to take anymore! He knew what he was doing when he started them, and he chose to ignore multiple warnings for his deviant behavior.
WE, being the Mods, know what goes on behind the scenes. We have jusitification for our actions, and you don't know how these decisions come to light. We're fair people, and given multiple chances, SlipknoT abused our trust and his right to post, so it was taken away justly.
1. That's false. Storm did what was necessary to stop him from posting overly stupid, redundant and sometimes vulgar threads. Slips claim that storm banned him for simply disliking him is a baseless excuse, trying to push the blame onto someone else for his own mistake.
2. I agree with this, their have been more offensive threads in the OTF, but you have to remember that he had been warned, several times, prior to making that thread that he needed to STOP making threads like that, especially about gross body functions/parts. He knew that failure to do so would result in a permanent ban, but he did it anyways. It's not like his ban was out of the blue, without any warning prior. Whether or not his thread was hugely offensive is irrelevent, it still did break the rules and went directly against the warnings he had recieved. He wasn't just banned for that poop thread, that was simply the straw that broke the camels back, he was also banned for the 50+ other overly idiotic and often gross threads he had made. Simple as that.