Wtf are you talking about. Purpose, meaning and reason are not interchangeable.
Pluto consists of a large amounts of matter and energy. All matter has an effect on energy and other matter. If it were to just disappear it would fundamentally alter the universe. I consist of a far smaller amount of matter and energy. If I were to disappear it would affect the universe much less.
If you can't accept the truth, fine.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
I don't see it like that, it's usually nature which causes this. Except sometimes when it's a sign of Armageddon.
Armageddon is a church doctrine...not Biblical....It was talking about the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD....It's historical...and such.
List some Armageddon verses.
With technology we have discovered the existence and processes of mutation. We have discovered fossilized remains dated back to prebiblical times. We have discerned the genetic code and as it is universal can be quite confident of common ancestry of all living things.
And, no. It's Jack's line. And will always be Jack's line.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
With technology we [b]have discovered the existence and processes of mutation. We have discovered fossilized remains dated back to prebiblical times. We have discerned the genetic code and as it is universal can be quite confident of common ancestry of all living things.And, no. It's Jack's line. And will always be Jack's line. [/B]
Don't you mean mutation by radioactivity? You still ignore everything i say and all the links i send, you clearly can't answer me without ignoring the FACTS, and you probably just pretended you couldn't understand me because what i said meant the truth. I have already sent messages on older pages explaining about fossils. The genetic code says that we are closer to plants than monkeys as far as chromosomes are concerned.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
The genetic code says that we are closer to plants than monkeys as far as chromosomes are concerned.
That's one of the most lame ideas I've ever heard. I think you have gotten something wrong somewhere. Please post your source information on this crazy idea. 😆
We are primates, Hominid, and a cousin to monkeys. Look at yourself in the mirror, you have a primate nose, primate eyes, primate ears, primate hair patterns, and primate hands and feet.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Don't you mean mutation by radioactivity? You still ignore everything i say and all the links i send, you clearly can't answer me without ignoring the FACTS, and you probably just pretended you couldn't understand me because what i said meant the truth. I have already sent messages on older pages explaining about fossils. The genetic code says that we are closer to plants than monkeys as far as chromosomes are concerned.
there'S mutation without radiactivity too....
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
By the way that ment i felt sorry for you, i don't agree like.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That's one of the most lame ideas I've ever heard. I think you have gotten something wrong somewhere. Please post your source information on this crazy idea. 😆We are primates, Hominid, and a cousin to monkeys. Look at yourself in the mirror, you have a primate nose, primate eyes, primate ears, primate hair patterns, and primate hands and feet.
Infact monkeys noses are more alike to a cats, i have also explaned this in earlier posts.
1. I learnt about plants being like humans according to chromosomes from my dad
2. In school I also learnt that we are 1 chromosome away from being a horse.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Infact monkeys noses are more alike to a cats, i have also explaned this in earlier posts.1. I learnt about plants being like humans according to chromosomes from my dad
2. In school I also learnt that we are 1 chromosome away from being a horse.
You need to do a lot more research, your conclusions are incorrect.
http://www.mattniemi.com/archives/020393.php
"For that matter, there are snippets of plant and animal DNA in humans"
Look down the page and see what you find.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Don't you mean mutation by radioactivity? You still ignore everything i say and all the links i send, you clearly can't answer me without ignoring the FACTS, and you probably just pretended you couldn't understand me because what i said meant the truth. I have already sent messages on older pages explaining about fossils. The genetic code says that we are closer to plants than monkeys as far as chromosomes are concerned.
I'm the one ignoring everything you say? If I was ignoring everything you said I wouldn't have surmised that you've consistently shown a lack of empathic faculties and thus are incapable of looking at things from another's angle. Therefore you ignore everything you don't want to hear, go off on strange tangents and come to strange conclusions.
Frankly I don't need your "facts" published by a Church group that concludes with an advertisement telling me to buy their books, I've studied both molecular genetics and evolution.
As for the last point. Laughable.
Originally posted by Chibi Boy
Infact monkeys noses are more alike to a cats, i have also explaned this in earlier posts.
1. I learnt about plants being like humans according to chromosomes from my dad
2. In school I also learnt that we are 1 chromosome away from being a horse.
Why talk in scientific language? The moment doesn't call for it.
And back to what Shakyamunison said about LOOKS, Ploar Bears look alot like Bears even though they are in completely different environments.
"Frankly I don't need your "facts" published by a Church group that concludes with an advertisement telling me to buy their books, I've studied both molecular genetics and evolution."
You say you don't need them but I bet you can't pull out some magic reason against anything they said, that's probably why you said you didn't need them in the first place.
But then I could say your conclusion to the non-existance of a god to be incorrect.
Let's point out the things which science cannot explain so one would have to say it was luck.
1. The moon position
2. The likeness between all the animals on earth, even animals in antarctica have eyes when it would be more usefull without incase snow gets inside them.
3. We have the only known planet to hold life, as aliens would have visited ages ago and left messages if the universe was million-billions of years old.
4. Mars would have life:
They still would evolve to adapt to Mars atmosphere, just as we did here when earth began as A LARGE BALL OF LAVA.
5. If the universe was million-billions of years old there would have been life here before which also would have left signs of life existing before.