.9~ = 1.

Started by DanZeke252 pages

.9~ = 1.

well on another site they are having a hugr argument over this. its actully kinda funny, but anyways, this one guy said .9~(if you dont no what ~ means it means repeating, going on forever.) = 1 but then people say that .9~ can never reach 1 becuase the 9's never end so it cant reach 1. I think that .9~ = 1 because of these reasons post by some guys.

"1/3 + 2/3 = 1
1/3= .3333~
2/3= .6666~
.3333~ + .6666~ = .9999~
.9999~ = 1"

Do 1/9 on a calculator (I mean, do the actual division.). What do you get? 0.11~.

2/9 = 0.22~
3/9 = 0.33~
4/9 = 0.44~

Do you see a pattern yet?

8/9 = 0.88~
9/9 = 0.99~ = 1"

what do yous think? The agruement is so funny though, its already on page 6 or 7.😆

....I'm so confused

.........

I just got out of school buddy.

yes i see the pattern

but what do i have to multiply .11 by to give me 1 ?

i dont know

lol now they are on the 8th page now argueing about it 😆

wow i so didnt even bother reading that 🤪

Originally posted by xLiNdS x 622x
wow i so didnt even bother reading that 🤪
ooo....took the words right outta my mouth 😐

That's so interesting 😮

lol.. it actully isnt interesting, the only reason i posted it is becasue they argued for about 8 pages on it, and i wanted to see what you would say

He is right. It goes by the same logic in number theory as the "anything over zero is undefined" rule.

For example, 1/infinity = 0. Nothing divided by anything equals zero, unless the numerator is zero, generally speaking. However, since infinity is considered neverending, whenever a number is divided by it, it is considered, in several branches of math, to be equal to zero. So, the principle is that when a number is infinitely close to something, it is considered equal to it (infinitely similar = same).

Also, by the transitive property of equality, since ~0.9 is equal to 9/9 and 9/9 is equal to one, ~0.9 = 1.

But anyways, he's right (depending slightly on which branch of math/physics/chemistry you're discussing). Sorry to bother you, sir. I hope that that was helpful.

Damn, I didn't see that thing about it not being interesting! I'm such a fool...

however...if you take the sum of xy over ab squared multiplied by n-2x to the tenth power subsect 3 minus quadrant bc subdivided by n squared assuming the hypotenuse is less than or equal to 0 times the right angle of c minus d times pi over yadayadayada blahblahblah.....😐

Hee-hee. By the way, Fëanor rocks! He's one of my favorite Silmarillion characters, along with Fingolfin.

Originally posted by Darth L. Dipsit
Hee-hee. By the way, Fëanor rocks! He's one of my favorite Silmarillion characters, along with Fingolfin.
dude!!!! you've just move three notches up on my list 😱

and yet no one seems to understand the guy but me 😬

if you're not going to post something constructive, perhaps it'd be better to just not post 😕

I've had similar arguments before...I once tried arguing with a teacher that zero and nothing (nullset) were the same thing if you actually wanted to apply these things to RL...that one was undecided

Originally posted by Fëanor
dude!!!! you've just move three notches up on my list 😱

and yet no one seems to understand the guy but me 😬

I'm glad I moved up!

And, about Fëanor, the guy was brave as Hell. Took on all those Balrogs by himself. And he had good reason, too! I mean, my friends say he was stupid for trying to kill them all alone, but I probably would have done the same. The guy was a hero. What's your take?

Dammit, I had to edit my post so I could quote what you wrote! I'm a slow poster.

Originally posted by §pearhead
if you're not going to post something constructive, perhaps it'd be better to just not post 😕

last i looked i thought i was in the OTF.....hence the gibberish

oh my bad....i'll take my leave then

ah crap...this is the otf, not the gdf...

carry on 😄

😱 yayness!!!

Tell me about Fëanor, then, man - what's your take (see my post above)?

Originally posted by Darth L. Dipsit
I'm glad I moved up!

And, about Fëanor, the guy was brave as Hell. Took on all those Balrogs by himself. And he had good reason, too! I mean, my friends say he was stupid for trying to kill them all alone, but I probably would have done the same. The guy was a hero. What's your take?

Dammit, I had to edit my post so I could quote what you wrote! I'm a slow poster.

all my buds in the lotr forum felt the same way as your friends did...he had a chance at regaining back the sil and felt he could take on the balrogs

but the thing i like about him is that he is unlike the other elves: willful, headstrong, not one to just make trivial crafts and poetry all day...underneath was a heart of a warrior and would've been a great king had he lived...and his obsession with the silmarillion made him more...human than the others