But, I think it depends on the movie. If its like 28 Days Later where the person instantly can become a zombie, than I'd agree that they'd run. But like on the original Night of the Living Dead, where it takes a while for a bitten victim to become a zombie, then maybe they get weak, and their leg muscles get weak, too weak for them to run. I dunno. I'll go with either 🙂
Originally posted by dave_kodak
lol, that would rule, some one should put that in a movie "warning this movie may have zombies on crack" hahahahaha ohh that rules so hardcore.
Yeah it does. I would love to see that. Lizzy doesn't know what she's talking about. The crack would affect them really bad. I would like to see the zombie try to get the crack from Whitney Houston and Bobby Brown.
😆 😆
How in the world could crack effect a zombie? They are walking bags of decomposing organs! It wouldn't do anything to them!
But, if your talking about Z, like on Rave to the Grave, I can understand that. But, we are not, and that movie really wasn't good. But it was better than Necropolis.
I think that if zombies just walked, it would be waaay scarier. But if they ran, it would be more adrenaline pumping. I dunno. Both is good for me 🙂
I have found the recent zombie style films that had running zombies more entertaining. I always get ticked off when a character does something really lame and gets caught by a lurching zombie. At least when they are fast the people have some excuse. What's with everybody trying to back their position with facts of science? We're talking about fantasy here!! Zombies!!
If you want to pick apart a horror movie based on unrealistic science facts, watch The Ring. Come on, a monster that comes out of the TV. That's an idea I can't even try and entertain. Running zombies I can.