Al Qaeda does not exist - 'war on terroism' is a fairy tale!

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Honestly..I can't answer that question..because I don't know the validity behind the statement "100's of people who worked in the WTC were told not to come." Based on what I do know and have read I do believe that there was some prior knowledge of a
"possible" attack, however, I don't believe the current administration took the threat seriously. That was the problem all along. They had this "Pro War against Iraq" agenda from the beginning, and they neglected to see that we had more pressing enemies..namely these loony "jihadist" terror groups, and an even bigger threat "North Korea".

We have no economic ties with Iraq, so that's why it became an easy target for this "War on Terror", even though there was no relation between the Taliban and Bathist government before 9/11.

perhaps hundreds of people where told not to come because they had been told "inside job" friends of family of the hijackers may have been allerted or perhaps it was sheer coinsidence

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Honestly..I can't answer that question..because I don't know the validity behind the statement "100's of people who worked in the WTC were told not to come." Based on what I do know and have read I do believe that there was some prior knowledge of a
"possible" attack, however, I don't believe the current administration took the threat seriously. That was the problem all along. They had this "Pro War against Iraq" agenda from the beginning, and they neglected to see that we had more pressing enemies..namely these loony "jihadist" terror groups, and an even bigger threat "North Korea".

We have no economic ties with Iraq, so that's why it became an easy target for this "War on Terror", even though there was no relation between the Taliban and Bathist government before 9/11.

No economic ties 😆

ROFL. You're oil comes from the middle-east 😆
Anyway, how about this for a motive for the latest middel-eastern war...

UNOCAL representative said in 1997

"..We can not go ahead with the deal with the Taliban for a pipeline network in Afghanistan untill an internationally recognised regime was established.."

Originally posted by Grand Mage Gav
perhaps hundreds of people where told not to come because they had been told "inside job" friends of family of the hijackers may have been allerted or perhaps it was sheer coinsidence

Yes anything BUT prior knowledge.

You just proven you are deeply, deeply, indoctrinated and are hopeless of believing in anything other than what people considered "official" tell you.

YOu have given you're mind away BIG TIME.

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yes anything BUT prior knowledge.

You just proven you are deeply, deeply, indoctrinated and are hopeless of believing in anything other than what people considered "official" tell you.

YOu have given you're mind away BIG TIME.

and it would seem you never had yours to give away in the first place

😂

Originally posted by Novusordo
Yeah but not in the sense the majority of people think and how they are controlled by our governments is also not known too widely.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Novusordo
You said you dont beleive they had prior knowledge. Answer me why hundreds of people who worked in the WTC were told to not come to work in the morning of 9/11 and dozens were told to get out the buildings before 8AM that day.

Honestly..I can't answer that question..because I don't know the validity behind the statement "100's of people who worked in the WTC were told not to come." Based on what I do know and have read I do believe that there was some prior knowledge of a
"possible" attack, however, I don't believe the current administration took the threat seriously. That was the problem all along. They had this "Pro War against Iraq" agenda from the beginning, and they neglected to see that we had more pressing enemies..namely these loony "jihadist" terror groups, and an even bigger threat "North Korea".

Sure you can answer that. On any given day in a building that holds about 35,000 workers, there are bound to be "hundreds" vacationing, sick, etc. Not one of them was specifically told not to come into work for the purpose of avoiding the attack. I'd like to know how many of these people Novusordo personally interviewed. It's garbage.

Novusordo, since you and Deano seem to believe the WTC attack was staged, and all he could provide were fake pictures and accounts from people who don't exist, I would like to see your information.

Originally posted by Grand Mage Gav
.........................................................................Yes

Traitor...

call out and burned

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
Sure you can answer that. On any given day in a building that holds about 35,000 workers, there are bound to be "hundreds" vacationing, sick, etc. Not one of them was specifically told not to come into work for the purpose of avoiding the attack. I'd like to know how many of these people Novusordo personally interviewed. It's garbage.

Novusordo, since you and Deano seem to believe the WTC attack was staged, and all he could provide were fake pictures and accounts from people who don't exist, I would like to see your information.

Kenobi, don't talk to me becuase you are absolutely impossible due to how you have given you're mind away so much.

If I provide proof/evidence, it's a rubbish source.

If the source is good, the people that did the research are not credible.

If its a good source and the people who did the research are credible then its all a coincidence.

If its a good source, the people who did the research are credible and it was not a coincidence then it must of some how been out of context.

And if I show you images that back-up other stuff then there photoshopped.

So you can **** off from now on. DOn't talk to me. Ever.

oswald kenobi is impossible

hey deano guy from the south of the border

Originally posted by Novusordo

If I provide proof/evidence, it's a rubbish source.

If the source is good, the people that did the research are not credible.

If its a good source and the people who did the research are credible then its all a coincidence.

If its a good source, the people who did the research are credible and it was not a coincidence then it must of some how been out of context.

And if I show you images that back-up other stuff then there photoshopped.

We finally agree on something!!!!! 😱

that makes a change

does anyone think that the london bombings wernt caused by Al Qaeda or their "partners in terror"

Originally posted by Novusordo
No economic ties 😆

ROFL. You're oil comes from the middle-east 😆
Anyway, how about this for a motive for the latest middel-eastern war...

[b]UNOCAL representative said in 1997 [/B]

Only about 10% of our oil comes from the middle east...and out of that 10% most of our comes from the Saudis. We would definately have been okay just getting oil from our other sources, however, greed set in...as well as the grudge George W Bush had with Sadam. There was no immediate need to invade Iraq..again..Bush is a stupid prick..who cares more about his family and his people(ie wealthy, oil companies, big business, etc) than he does about the average American...Did the administration plan the attacks? No.

Did they know about the attacks?
Somewhat..but they were to preoccupied with other stupid crap to respond..stupidity and greed is the main reason why this war was started.

Iraq was also a nifty way of venting our frustrations at the whole Middle East, since we have no "major" economic ties with them. It was more of like..a warning to Syria..Iran..Persia..and yes..even Saudi Arabia..that if they keep f'ing with us..we'll take over your country and your oil...😆 😆 😆

Originally posted by whobdamandog

Iraq was also a nifty way of venting our frustrations at the whole Middle East, since we have no "major" economic ties with them. It was more of like..a warning to Syria..Iran..Persia..and yes..even Saudi Arabia..that if they keep f'ing with us..we'll take over your country and your oil...😆 😆 😆

and Britain will fight with you as always

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Only about 10% of our oil comes from the middle east...and out of that 10% most of our comes from the Saudis. We would definately have been okay just getting oil from our other sources, however, greed set in...as well as the grudge George W Bush had with Sadam. There was no immediate need to invade Iraq..again..Bush is a stupid prick..who cares more about his family and his people(ie wealthy, oil companies, big business, etc) than he does about the average American...Did the administration plan the attacks? No.

Did they know about the attacks?
Somewhat..but they were to preoccupied with other stupid crap to respond..stupidity and greed is the main reason why this war was started.

Iraq was also a nifty way of venting our frustrations at the whole Middle East, since we have no "major" economic ties with them. It was more of like..a warning to Syria..Iran..Persia..and yes..even Saudi Arabia..that if they keep f'ing with us..we'll take over your country and your oil...😆 😆 😆

You're building you're own little story around it all to comfort yourself.

9/11 was orcastrated by the people who contorl the US and it was not just incompetence.

NORAD being ordered to stand down that morning is enough proof you need and NORAD has NEVER, EVER, stood down for a single day in its 50 years of existance.

NORAD stood down??????????

I lived near there once.

Originally posted by Novusordo
You're building you're own little story around it all to comfort yourself.

9/11 was orcastrated by the people who contorl the US and it was not just incompetence.

NORAD being ordered to stand down that morning is enough proof you need and NORAD has NEVER, EVER, stood down for a single day in its 50 years of existance.

we build our stories to comfort ourselves but perhaps our story is correct and your stories are to feed your need to belive that something more is happening in your life and that all establishment is evil