Contrary to what ppl think, Malak would own yoda, Malak wasnt just some pissant, the only reason he was easy to defeat was because you were Revan. Maul and fisto would a good fight, while malak and yoda duel. Sion and Ulic duel, Malak would overpower Yoda when they saber lock, which seems to always happens when Yoda duels someone(Sidious/Dooku). After Yoda is broken, Malak would crush Fisto, then they would triple team Ulic.
Originally posted by Darth Infidus
Contrary to what ppl think, Malak would own yoda, Malak wasnt just some pissant, the only reason he was easy to defeat was because you were Revan. Maul and fisto would a good fight, while malak and yoda duel. Sion and Ulic duel, Malak would overpower Yoda when they saber lock, which seems to always happens when Yoda duels someone(Sidious/Dooku). After Yoda is broken, Malak would crush Fisto, then they would triple team Ulic.
...And then Ulic would own them all.
Had to finish that scenario.
Ulic would own Sion so much faster then Malak could ever hope to defeat Yoda or Vice Versa... After which Fisto and Ulic would team up against Sion or Maul (Fisto might be weaker then either one of those, but he would still be able to hang on) Together with Ulic he would easily destroy the remaining Sith.
Ulic alone could match Malak and I have no idea who of that two would win he's a great fighter too. After which Ulic Fisto and Yoda would own Malak.
Originally posted by 2Tidus!
I have to agree with Plagues here. Whats wrong with you? Fisto vs Maul= Fisto, Ulic vs Sion=Ulic, Yoda vs Malak=Yoda.
This is exactly how it would go down, but Maul defeating Fisto I don't know, because Fisto I think if not mistaken (correct me if I'm wrong) is the 3rd strongest duelist in the Jedi Order.
WHY does everyone write off Malak as some shitty sith lord? Just because he was defeated, doesn't make him crap. Mace was defeated, but nobody writes 'him' off as a crappy Jedi. Malak CAN beat Sidious, would in turn BARELY defeated Yoda. Malak is far stronger physically and in lightsaber technique than Dooku or Sids, has greater force power than Mace, and is ALOT younger than Yoda. It wouldnt be easy or fast, but Malak can defeat Yoda.
Originally posted by Darth Infidus
WHY does everyone write off Malak as some shitty sith lord? Just because he was defeated, doesn't make him crap. Mace was defeated, but nobody writes 'him' off as a crappy Jedi. Malak CAN beat Sidious, would in turn BARELY defeated Yoda. Malak is far stronger physically and in lightsaber technique than Dooku or Sids, has greater force power than Mace, and is ALOT younger than Yoda. It wouldnt be easy or fast, but Malak can defeat Yoda.
Oh my god.... Please leave my thread....