Originally posted by ROYALGUARDthere's a difference between a muslim and a muslim terrorist. Muslim terrorists are so delusional they'll kill anyone against them, and thanks to US and Europe's brilliant plans to send them weapons... you could see it coming.
ofcourse islam is the cause of terror? why because of its people? they are fanatics.if islam have no fanatics then its not gonna cause terror
islam is not the cause of terror. people who join it and who act upon their rage..."kill them infidels" are the terrorist not the religion itself.
1. Sell muslims weapons for money
2. Bad-mouth their religion
3. Steal their goods and take away their freedom and privelages
4. Make up an excuse to attack them
5. Bomb their allies and make them bankrupt
6. Take glory
Originally posted by ROYALGUARD
ofcourse islam is the cause of terror? why because of its people? they are fanatics.if islam have no fanatics then its not gonna cause terror
islam is not the cause of terror. people who join it and who act upon their rage..."kill them infidels" are the terrorist not the religion itself.
You are the brightest example of someone who has no idea what islam is.
Fistly Islam NEVER N. E. V. E. R. supports killing people or war unless it is a urgent selfprotection. Those people who caused that terract on 9/11 did it not because they were muslims but because they were bastard. Again you can't judge about religion by some crazy loonatics, because there are such people in every world religion.
Fistly Islam NEVER N. E. V. E. R. supports killing people or war unless it is a urgent selfprotection.
I never know if people are talking about some new form of Islam I know nothing about, or the Koran Islam. In which case, it endorses a lot of killing. Don't be so $#@%ing blind, they even have a clause that says that 'non-believers' are to pay taxes or die. 🙄
Originally posted by NineCoronas
I never know if people are talking about some new form of Islam I know nothing about, or the Koran Islam. In which case, it endorses a lot of killing. Don't be so $#@%ing blind, they even have a clause that says that 'non-believers' are to pay taxes or die. 🙄
This statement was a bit uncalled for and I apologize in advance for the patronizing attitude.
Originally posted by lord xyzIt's not a rumor. Even still, it is by itself a religion that is not tolerant of non-believers, regardless of whether the practicioners ignore that doctrine or not.
I think the koran saying that is a rumour. Besisdes, Islam is only 1500 years old. Remember Christianity and Judaism when they were 1500 years old?
Originally posted by NineCoronas
I never know if people are talking about some new form of Islam I know nothing about, or the Koran Islam. In which case, it endorses a lot of killing. Don't be so $#@%ing blind, they even have a clause that says that 'non-believers' are to pay taxes or die. 🙄
1000 years old taxes has nothing to do with religion. It's about politics. Same and even worse things were happening to christians because of the greedy rulers. So?
Man, I am muslim, I want to insure you that there in nothing in Koran that supports terrorism or violance. You are the one who is blind here since you believe anything you hear on TV.
Originally posted by Sam ZExcept I didn't hear that on TV, and most of TV says the Islam is a peaceful religion (I have only Basic Cable). I barely watch it in the first place.
1000 years old taxes has nothing to do with religion. It's about politics. Same and even worse things were happening to christians because of the greedy rulers. So?
Man, I am muslim, I want to insure you that there in nothing in Koran that supports terrorism or violance. You are the one who is blind here since you believe anything you hear on TV.
Originally posted by Sam ZIndeed. Crusades is a prime example, eh?
It is not less tolerant to non-believers than any other religion.
Did you happen to miss this, or did you decide to ignore my pre-emptive apology?
Originally posted by NineCoronas
This statement was a bit uncalled for and I apologize in advance for the patronizing attitude.
Originally posted by NineCoronas
Indeed. Crusades is a prime example, eh?Did you happen to miss this, or did you decide to ignore my pre-emptive apology?
And what about Crusades? I'm not sure I translated this word right, but if i did then Crusades were not only in muslim history but in christian too.
So what? It makes christians evil as well?
Originally posted by Sam ZI haven't said Islamic's are evil, or Christian's are. I was using it as an example when a lack of tolerance has gone way too far.
And what about Crusades? I'm not sure I translated this word right, but if i did then Crusades were not only in muslim history but in christian too.
So what? It makes christians evil as well?
Originally posted by NineCoronas
I haven't said Islamic's are evil, or Christian's are. I was using it as an example when a lack of tolerance has gone way too far.
I see, but it all about politics. This wasn't really aimed at spreading religion's ideas but to get more territory. Rulers of all countries wanted to enlarge their territory. So no wonder there were the same rulers in arabic countries.
Muslims go by the Koran and there is nothing like "kill non-believers". There mentioned telling other people about islam's ideas but never by forcing them to become a muslim.
Originally posted by Sam ZMaybe not now. May I ask why so many different 'sects' of Muslims are at each other's throats?
I see, but it all about politics. This wasn't really aimed at spreading religion's ideas but to get more territory. Rulers of all countries wanted to enlarge their territory. So no wonder there were the same rulers in arabic countries.
Muslims go by the Koran and there is nothing like "kill non-believers". There mentioned telling other people about islam's ideas but never by forcing them to become a muslim.
Originally posted by NineCoronas
Maybe not now. May I ask why so many different 'sects' of Muslims are at each other's throats?
Sects?? There are only two branches of Islam and in fact they are the same, people of two branches believe in the same thing but they have an argument that is actually not about religion but about power. They have different views on who must be on the head of religion this days. By the head of religion I mean leader (something like Pop for katholics) but that's the only differance between sunni and shiiti.
I honostly don't know what sects you are talking about.