Why no Shmi Skywalker in Episode III??

Started by Sith-Nerd2 pages

because

and

I say ditto to that!

Originally posted by ((The_Anomaly))
calm down ken, there are worse and far more annoying people then him

Yup, there is a lot worse "bashing" than the above poster.... I'm surprised that Ken gives a stern warning here when I've seen much more agressive (and graphic) bashing elsewhere which doesn't get a stern reply. Case in point: Dark Yoda who oftentime posts an evil zombie who kicks violently into his couch says "F*** Your thread". That to me is offesive and sick. But I don't see any stern warnings to him. Crap stuff like THAT should be banned. It is irritating when no mods say anything about that.... I've seen the zombie numerous times and he just gets away with it..... Please, Ken be a bit more fair in your warnings...

Sith-Nerd. Shush.

😂 Evil zombie? That's Dave Chapelle as Rick James! 😂

words of thought; I have learned not to attack the mods for thier point of veiw, or their discplining of another member.. ..
I think Ken's point was it is usless for 1000 people to keep saying this is useless, this sucks, stupid thread... after a while it is quite annoying.. if some one says it once thqts fien but then the calvary charges in saying the exact same thing..

( personally the whole kicking the couch thing is funny)

Originally posted by Ken Kenobi
Well, you would be wasting your time. 😬

Thinking of ways to better a film that is already completed is doing nothing at all.

I really do not know where i go wrong in starting this thread..Throughout the time i'm here i saw loads of ppl in this forum talking about how they want some things the ROTS to have been better..some plot holes..some special effects..some deleted scenes..some questioning the characters and wat they did..

I merely comment that the inclusion of Shmi as a flashback or in a dream would have given Anakin's turn at the end of it a more powerful impact to the audience..esp those who had loved the OT.

The Shmi ghost tink is of cos rather ridiculous but it's just a suggestion. If she is the some-sort Virgin Mary, i would say she deserve more attention in the story (no offense to Protestants), especially since she did brought him up.

Thanks obi_wans_beard for your comment on the topic..i had hoped more ppl would have responded the way u did.

I think Shmi was an odd character, mysterious in a way.
After all the force made lif in her, she must have been chosen for a reason. A bit more background may have made things more interesting, or too complicated.

Maybe her forefathers were the original Sith high priests or Lighsaber crystal merchants.

Originally posted by p. skywalker
words of thought; I have learned not to attack the mods for thier point of veiw, or their discplining of another member.. ..
I think Ken's point was it is usless for 1000 people to keep saying this is useless, this sucks, stupid thread... after a while it is quite annoying.. if some one says it once thqts fien but then the calvary charges in saying the exact same thing..

( personally the whole kicking the couch thing is funny)

Oh I'm not attacking Ken's point of view, as a matter of fact I think he does a great job of putting people in their place when they get out of line... I respect that very much and appreciate his peacekeeping efforts! And yes, I understand what you mean, his point is simply that it is useless for 1000 people to keep saying those things... but to be given a stern "2nd warning" because of that just seems a bit harsh....

Personally, I like Cyber Vader's idea. And even if a Movie is out, we can still have the freedom to imagine stuff if we wanted. Just because it's made doesn't mean we can't think up new stuff. Hell, Lucas made new stuff when he redid the OT in '97.

Kind of pointless, in my opinion, to spend afternoons wishing for things that didn't happen.

No it's not. I wished all day in '01 that Febuary was just a dream when Dale Earnhardt died.

That is entirely different. Not that I care about NASCAR.

It's not that different. And we're allowed both the freedom of speech and imagination. Even if it just to think up new scenes and stuff. People talk about things that would make KOTOR 1 or 2 or any other game better. Wouldn't the general rule apply to movies too that we could have a hobby thinking up new scenes even if they won't ever be considered?

Originally posted by Tulak Hord
It's not that different. And we're allowed both the freedom of speech and imagination. Even if it just to think up new scenes and stuff. People talk about things that would make KOTOR 1 or 2 or any other game better. Wouldn't the general rule apply to movies too that we could have a hobby thinking up new scenes even if they won't ever be considered?

Yeah agreed! Maybe we should just make this official...All those who wish to give new inputs to the movie can do so..Den we see its strong points and weak points.

Besides the Shmi thing, surely people would wanna know about the Sypho Dyas, establishment of the Sith Order and what nots..