Kingdom of Heaven vs Gladiator

Started by doan_m2 pages

^One might wonder. Two movies with strong reference to history and its a forum that is completely meant for fiction......

Gladiator was definitely better, the trailor for Kingdom of Heaven made it look better than it really was, though I still enjoyed it, but prefer Gladiator.

Once again...

Neither of these two films are Science Fiction or Fantasy.
Both are historically based.

Gladiator holds a smoother pace. It also seems to have a better sense of it's own direction as a movie. they are both great films in my opinion though. Ridley scott has definently got the epic period peices down. Unlike Oliver stone. alexander was so bad.

Both are good films, even with Orlando Bloom as a lead (Jesus, think about that for a minute! Who says Hollywood doesn't take risks anymore! 😛). I do find the period and places explored in Kingdom of Heaven to be more interesting however, a little more universal than a Gladiator revolt.

Wrong section anyway gladiator was better found KOH abit borring

Most likly and without a doubt I like "Gladiator"More then Kingdom hearats.Even through I never seen that movie.jm

Originally posted by GCG
Fourthly, how does a Blacksmith, who doesn’t know his father from a sack of potatoes, become the protector of Jerusalem, aid to a leper king and protect the helpless? Actually, how does Godfrey even come to think that his blacksmith son could possibly be up to that task of doing it? Well apparently he must have really believed that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree unlike Marcus Aurelius who thought Commodus was a spoilt failure. Maximus was a general in the roman army and had all the fighting & leadership skills (up to a certain degree) to lead Rome. What a blacksmith could have had ….meh I dunno.

That's the biggest problem with KoH's story. They completely leave out the fact he was originally a mercenary siege engineer, which throws the story off. And then there's the fact Balian was actually old when the siege of Jerusalem happened. At least Gladiator doesn't have a real historical backdrop to screw over.

The book, IMO, is much better for KoH.

the extended director's cut dvd is much, much, much better than the theatrical release. it's too bad this release wasn't the one that made it into theaters, but all the content that was cut out makes the movie well over three hours long.

if anyone believes there's not enough character development in KOH they should really at the very least rent the extended version. The difference between the theatrical release and the extended verison are really vast. the film is far superior as a result, primarily for the character development.

there are also some additional action scenes, much more gore and blood, the addition of an entirely new and pivotal character that was not in the original movie, and a more expanded treatment of queen sybilla (eva green) and king baldwin (edward norton). highly recommended.