Poll
62%
38%
Re: General Greivous, Warrior or wimp?
Originally posted by Will-one Kenobi
All right i dont give a damm about wheather there has been another thread on this
You should, or you'll have your head smashed in by fanatics... 🙄
Warrior; Obi-Wan may have killed him, but he wasn't killed in seconds like a flimsy battle droid. And he was a threat to the Republic.
Originally posted by garn
The cartoon series, The Clone Wars, is canon material.
Nope, not really. If it ain't a movie or a script or a novel based on the movie, it's not canon. Don't try to tell me otherwise, you will not win.
Grievous was #1 on the Jedi hit list and a threat to the Republic; even if he did run from Obi-Wan because the Jedi was hauling him, he is still a warrior.
He was one of the most original and unique looking villains in the history of cinema and should have been portrayed like the badass he looked. But he wasn't. Then again, ROTS was just one day out of his life (and happened to be the last) but it was easy to imagine him being a bad mother f*cker on other days.
Warrior for me. I mean, look at him move during the Clone Wars animated series at the Battle of Hypori and the Battle of Coruscant. Bang . Bang. Bang. There goes Daakman Barrek. Goodbye Shaa-Gi. Oww, that's gotta hurt K'Khruk. There goes your head Tarr Seir. Hope you're crippled Aayla Secura. You're out Shaak Ti. and so on and so on.
Why the hell GL made Grievous look so crappy in ROTS? Yeah, Mace force-crushed his lungs during the Battle of Coruscant in the Clone Wars animated series. BUT really, Grievous should get more credit than that.