This essay is the first part of an essay I wrote a couple of weeks ago in which I attempted to explain the story of the matrix trilogy based on the spoken dialogue in the movie. What I missed in many of the matrix interpretations that I have come across on the internet is EVIDENCE for particular views or ideas! I feel that the most important factor in developing an argument for a particular view or offering an interpretive explanation that is open to numerous interpretations (such as the matrix trilogy) is PROOF!
In other words, the interpretation of The Matrix that follows is based on evidence provided in the dialogue. Here and there I may go out on a limb, but I have tried to keep myself within limits of wild speculation by sticking to what people say in the movie or to what we see happen on screen.
So, cookies are cookies and not ‘upgrade programs’ as some people have suggested because nobody in the movies (not even the Oracle) refers to these cookies as any type of ‘upgrade program’. Zion is not a matrix-within-a-matrix because no character in the entire trilogy mentions a single word about such an onion-like or shell-like structure.
Seraph is not a previous ‘One’, because although there are hints from the Merovingian: “angel without wings”, it is not convincing enough because the Merovingian never mentions it explicitly (nor anyone else for that matter). Although there are hints from the Oracle on the Merovingian being a former One: “the Merovingian is an old, primitive program who has been here since the beginning” and from Persephone: “he was once like you [Neo]”, these pieces of dialogue are not convincing enough to suggest that the Merovingian indeed was a former One.>>from>vader519