Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
My point is that in a debate, inertia and everything else matters.In a comic, you'll see things to make a match interesting, like bats getting hit by supes, but you know reason within characters, that wouldn't make sense here.
What was in jest, I've seen you just many a time, and that didn't look like jesting. Now what your assumptions were I never would've guessed, but the shit smilies weren't a big deal.
I just explained your fallacy to you, the only part that you seem hung on is that pm, forget the pm, you sound like you were serious about it, or you wouldn't keep bringing it up.
Where have I been overreacting?
In a comic debate we talk about how the fight would go if the characters were fighting to the best of their ability within the parameters set by their comic book appearances. For example if wolverine is shown in comics being able to stay conscious and take hits from the hulk and still keep going, then in a debate you cant turn it around and say according to real world this and that and his bio he shouldnt be able to do that. It just doesnt work like that. Despite your personal feelings on the matter.
By your own admission you're not a big comic book reader i remember you saying to me you've only recently started to read comics more than you used to. Therefore i said you're hardly in the best position to make such a comment on marvel comics which is true. I never said you couldnt make an assessment, i never said your comment was invalid. You however over reacted and took a negative stance on that comment saying ive said it many times before, ive been talking behind your back saying it and getting really quite defensive on the issue.
The jest was in saying you hated certain characters. That was obviously a joke because you had just said people keep calling you a hater. It just seems now you've forgotten the context within which i made those comments. Its fortunate that i have not.
Originally posted by willRules
Hey whirly I see you changed your name back.why are you criticizing Marvel? I think they are just as good (or as bad) as D.c. Sometimes one is better, sometimes the other.
Whirly please dont take offence at this, but I know you are a superman fan so do you think this might slightly affect your opinion of marvel?
Dont take offence I myself am a fan of Batman, Nightwing, Deathstroke, Spider-man, Deadpool, X-men...........etc,etc
Originally posted by willRules
Hey whirly I see you changed your name back.why are you criticizing Marvel? I think they are just as good (or as bad) as D.c. Sometimes one is better, sometimes the other.
Whirly please dont take offence at this, but I know you are a superman fan so do you think this might slightly affect your opinion of marvel?
Dont take offence I myself am a fan of Batman, Nightwing, Deathstroke, Spider-man, Deadpool, X-men...........etc,etc
Read the intro we are talking about groundbreaking titles🙂
I read a lot of Marvel just not the ones you mentioned 😂
Originally posted by GalacticStormWhy cant we all just...get along?hug
In a comic debate we talk about how the fight would go if the characters were fighting to the best of their ability within the parameters set by their comic book appearances. For example if wolverine is shown in comics being able to stay conscious and take hits from the hulk and still keep going, then in a debate you cant turn it around and say according to real world this and that and his bio he shouldnt be able to do that. It just doesnt work like that. Despite your personal feelings on the matter.By your own admission you're not a big comic book reader i remember you saying to me you've only recently started to read comics more than you used to. Therefore i said you're hardly in the best position to make such a comment on marvel comics which is true. I never said you couldnt make an assessment, i never said your comment was invalid. You however over reacted and took a negative stance on that comment saying ive said it many times before, ive been talking behind your back saying it and getting really quite defensive on the issue.
The jest was in saying you hated certain characters. That was obviously a joke because you had just said people keep calling you a hater. It just seems now you've forgotten the context within which i made those comments. Its fortunate that i have not.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
In a comic debate we talk about how the fight would go if the characters were fighting to the best of their ability within the parameters set by their comic book appearances. For example if wolverine is shown in comics being able to stay conscious and take hits from the hulk and still keep going, then in a debate you cant turn it around and say according to real world this and that and his bio he shouldnt be able to do that. It just doesnt work like that. Despite your personal feelings on the matter.
Nono, wolverine has been ko'ed by a brushing hit from the hulk, and a light hit from thing, if he takes initial trauma like a human, then there is no reason he shouldn't be knocked out. Why would you even say loki?
Comics do that to stay interesting, batman CAN be killed in one hit from peter, will it happen in a comic. no. The fanboys will be upset.
Also you can't gauge the strenght of those hits, can you say hulk was hitting him at his hardest? Thats what I'm arguing. Wolverine is inconsitant, go by his characteristics.
Did wolvie get an upgrade listed by marvel, no.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
By your own admission you're not a big comic book reader i remember you saying to me you've only recently started to read comics more than you used to. Therefore i said you're hardly in the best position to make such a comment on marvel comics which is true. I never said you couldnt make an assessment, i never said your comment was invalid. You however over reacted and took a negative stance on that comment saying ive said it many times before, ive been talking behind your back saying it and getting really quite defensive on the issue.
I said I don't read them diehard man.
I read manga, western, and eastern comics alike, I probably read more stuff than almost anyone around here. I write too, forget what I did or didn't say, its what I'm telling you now. I don't obsess, but then again I read very fast, around 10 pages in a minute from a novel, if I want to.
Thats what I'm telling you now...
I apologize if that comment about what you said in a pm has gotten to you, but make no mistake, you have said it before, I was only joking for the most part. When you said that, it was a shot at my credibility.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
The jest was in saying you hated certain characters. That was obviously a joke because you had just said people keep calling you a hater. It just seems now you've forgotten the context within which i made those comments. Its fortunate that i have not.
I said I hated who? I was joking with the smilies dude, if I were REALLY MAD, you would have seen it in my post.
I don't think you intentionally talked bad about me, I'd never think that.
You may have unintentionally raised stir, is my point.
I wont bother to answer it all because this thread needs to get back on topic. Im not mad about anything im just surprised you thought i was talking about you behind your back and instead of asking me about it you just dropped it on me after i questioned you in this thread. That was wrong. But apart from that all the other things about Wolverine and everything else can be dealt with in the versus forum, i really wasnt focusing on those points.