Originally posted by NemeBro
Ah, so it is because you are a gender-betraying ladyman.That's what I thought.
Also, Blank101 is the shit. There is fanfiction that qualifies as quality lit and it's triggering to me that you discount it out of hand.
😈
Originally posted by Zampanó
I think it is important, even when being intentionally or facetiously abrasive (which may or may not be the case here; I would hate to assume that my own internalized-contextualization of your world-experience is more valid or universal than anyone else's interpretation, or in fact (though to no greater extent) your own contextualization of your own interpretation) to preface comments like this with a trigger warning. It is all too easy to accidentally or incidentally marginalize the experience or emotions (though I am careful not to conflate the two, I recognize the close link these concepts share (which may or may not be reciprocal, depending on one's conception of the relation between such ideas)) of peripheralized groups (i.e. the gendered, transgendered, agendered, pangendered engendered, etc.) and if a member of one of those (that is to say, our) groups feels triggered then you have done a very great disservice both to the affronted other as well as your own internalized-contextualized mode of discourse.Also, Blank101 is the shit. There is fanfiction that qualifies as quality lit and it's triggering to me that you discount it out of hand.
😈
1. U mad, bro?
2. There are "opinions" that are more valid than your own on your subjective perceptions of reality. These perceptions can be clinically relevant. We are still quite new to psychology but you yourself used gender identity terms that were developed by such a community, meaning, you hold those opinions/evaluations in higher regard than your own. If you didn't, then you would have come up with your own labels which would prove that "your own contextualization of your own interpretation" of reality is indeed superior to that clinical researchers and "experts".
3. Bam.
4. ???
5. Profit.