Novak Explodes Live on CNN

Originally posted by PVS
i see avoidance of the point is a tool of the right.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Shall I direct you to the 'gaysrok' thread?

I am not quite sure what that is supposed to mean either.....

meh, he's just trolling.
with such a conviction you would think he was recieving a salary for it.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Shall I direct you to the 'gaysrok' thread?

hahahaha

Originally posted by PVS
meh, he's just trolling.
with such a conviction you would think he was recieving a salary for it.

Actually, that would be you trolling for calling people "dumbasses" when they point out that what happened in the video was hardly an "explosion" of any sort.

no backfire, pointing out a bad thread title is not the act of a dumbass.

filling the thread with:

-he wasnt exploding

-absolutely he didnt explode

-didnt seem like he exploded to me

-i agree. no way was that an explosion.

-nope, no explosion there

thats just a dumbass convention

Originally posted by PVS
no backfire, pointing out a bad thread title is not the act of a dumbass.

filling the thread with:

-he wasnt exploding

-absolutely he didnt explode

-didnt seem like he exploded to me

-i agree. no way was that an explosion.

-nope, no explosion there

thats just a dumbass convention

Originally posted by Bardock42
I have to agree with Shitboy and KiodRock...how is that an explosion?

yeah, ok dude.

Originally posted by KidRock
He got up and left the set. What an explosion. Someone get that man in anger management!

Originally posted by FeceMan
I was thinking more along the lines of Bruce Almight. KidRock's right, that isn't exactly an explosion.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I have to agree with Shitboy and KiodRock...how is that an explosion?

Thos three were the only ones saying something aboot the lack of explosion......(and point of this thread by the way)

If you want to talk aboot what he has done go ahead...but taking some pointless and silly occurence doesn't really make any sense....(exxagerated or not)

pointless and silly? you obviously never looked into the circumstances behind the topic and just viewed it as a "funniest home videos" clip. what a waste
ill just leave it as news and request a closure of this thread.

Originally posted by PVS
pointless and silly? you obviously never looked into the circumstances behind the topic and just viewed it as a "funniest home videos" clip. what a waste
ill just leave it as news and request a closure of this thread.

Yes as I said, I couldn't read anything aboot the "circustances behind" cause you just posted the "funniest home video" .....but its ok....call us dumbasses for not agreeing with you........any way you turn it it wasn't really misbehaviour.....

i posted the link to the article, but i guess its such hard work to *click* it, so why not just carry on and spam? and you would actually have to read whats behind it to agree or disagree. you're just making useless comments on trivial matters such as a thread title, and you know it.
thats why i called you dumbasses. because you're purposely trying to be just that

Originally posted by PVS
no backfire, pointing out a bad thread title is not the act of a dumbass.

filling the thread with:

-he wasnt exploding

-absolutely he didnt explode

-didnt seem like he exploded to me

-i agree. no way was that an explosion.

-nope, no explosion there

thats just a dumbass convention

So agreeing with what's correct is the act of a dumbass? No. Poor deduction and logic on your part. If you don't like people pointing out a falsity in a misinformative title, then don't falsely advertise anymore, simple as that.

pointless and silly? you obviously never looked into the circumstances behind the topic and just viewed it as a "funniest home videos" clip.

That's what the title of the thread insinuates that it is.

And now I'll go ahead and close this thread.