Language

Originally posted by Superfly4000
I do not deny the ability for that non speaking creatures have for thought. However I do not understand how one can think to ones self withought thinking in words, how does this work? How does one say something to ones selfe if one cannot describe with words? I am not denying, I am simply questioning. On other terms, please do not use God as the anchor of your answers, because God is simply and idea which we as humans invented through language.

Oh Please 🙄 . We think to ourselves with language because we know how too. If we didn't we would think to ourselves by other means. And I didn't use God as anchor. You seem to use evolution but thats okay 🙄 if you can not deal with having the opinion of Creationism then don't bring up the idea of evolution. God was not just invented through language. language is one of MANY ways of communicating. People are obviously real, but are they just ideas simply invented by language? No they are not.

Evolution is not an idea, it is a fact. Philosophy nor even religion can come up with anything to deny that fact because the evidence is there at even the most basic of levels. God is the anchor of your answer because your belivefe in his existence obviously altered your opinion.

Originally posted by Superfly4000
Evolution is not an idea, it is a fact. Philosophy nor even religion can come up with anything to deny that fact because the evidence is there at even the most basic of levels. God is the anchor of your answer because your belivefe in his existence obviously altered your opinion.

actually Psychologist who study the POSSIBILITY of Evolution say humans actually have more biologically in common with mice then they do Primates. In your question you dealt with Evolution. You made a thread questioning, looking for answer. I gave you my answering saying I believe in creationism. I did not base my answer on creationism. I simply said I do not believe in Evolution. You try to act intelligent but as far I am concerned thats all it is : an act.

You claim that god created us seperately from animals. it is a fact that we are animals. we are not above any other creatures on this earth. The bible is not meant to be taken literaly, it is filled with symbols to be taken metaphorically.

On evolutionary terms all creatures on earth come from a similar (unknown) source so it is not a surprise that we have similarities to mice. It is however a fact that we came apes, and apes most likely came from another source.

Originally posted by Superfly4000
You claim that god created us seperately from animals. it is a fact that we are animals. we are not above any other creatures on this earth. The bible is not meant to be taken literaly, it is filled with symbols to be taken metaphorically.

On evolutionary terms all creatures on earth come from a similar (unknown) source so it is not a surprise that we have similarities to mice. It is however a fact that we came apes, and apes most likely came from another source.

Okay let make this simple. You are coming from an Evolutionary point of view. I am coming from a Creationism point of view. No one is too say one of us is right one is wrong. We don't know for sure. We can only believe in what we want. Science doesn't prove everything it only tries to explain. There is NO fact that we came from apes, its just a thought or belief like the belief God created us. I don't care what you argue, no matter how you argue it. There will never be enough info to deny God or to prove evolution is the way life began. There can be evolution and God too.

damn, i wish we could have argued more. lol

The Key to a healthy relationship is good punctuation..!!!!

Originally posted by debbiejo
The Key to a healthy relationship is good punctuation..!!!!

Good job!

😂

vel, faen om ikkje språk sko vær vigtige

Wittgenstein and Ayer have argued the cases of Philosophy of Language, Linguistics, etc. to the bone...go read them...all prety meaningless...just as what I'm writing now.

i still say god is just an idea, while evolution is a fact.

Words are useless
Especially sentences
They can stand for anything
How can they explain how I feel?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Words are useless
Especially sentences
They can stand for anything
How can they explain how I feel?

They're insufficient....wouldn't it be great if a person had the ability to throw an emotion or feeling...like maybe one of our senses to someone else to catch...Wouldn't that make for better and clearer communication.
Much more understood I would think.

Facial expressions and our eyes are usually the most powerful ways we can convey our emotions.

Facial expressions and our eyes are usually the most powerful ways we can convey our emotions

Ah, too true.