Dont insist in that, dude. You didnt proove anything. You only posted that you thought the beatles werent that great and that you thought that patton was better and some people like rush were better songwritters. And you asked me why they were that great, nothing more. At least , i posted concrete polls and lists by magazines and countries.
Originally posted by bakerboy
Dont insist in that, dude. You didnt proove anything. You only posted that you thought the beatles werent that great and that you thought that patton was better and some people like rush were better songwritters.
That's a lie isn't it? Because we both quite clearly know that I proved why I believe what I do with substantial examples and evidence. All you had was irrelevant events and continued one liners.
Originally posted by bakerboy
And you asked me why they were that great, nothing more. At least , i posted concrete polls and lists by magazines and countries.
You didn't post "concrete polls" or polls in general. You posted "The Beatles are always at the top of lists...etc etc." Which matters not anyway.
Let's not do this, it doesn't get any more fun for you to keep getting made fun of does it?
-AC