Darth Maul vs. Darth Sion

If Sion only dies once, I think Maul would take it easy. Otherwise Sion, no doubt.

How so? Sion lead the Sith Assassins who purged the Jedi survivors. Maul was probably the equivalent of one of the better Assassins.

Hardly, those Assassins merely fed off the Force of other Force users, without strong opponents, they weren't strong themselves.

True, bad point. But I don't know, someone like him has got to be capable of defeating Maul. And he was Darth Traya's top Apprentice alongside Nihilus, showing he was superior to dozens and dozens of others. He's easily superior to Bandon, who could definately take Maul.

How is he easily superior to Bandon? I am going to reduce his life count to three lives.

He has to be. Bandon was chosen as apprentice to Malak from his various followers and acolytes. Sion was chosen out of the best Sith at the Academy, the ones who passed all the trials and tests put forth by Traya. And like I said, he was right next to Nihilus under Traya, and was one of the two leaders of the Sith forces after his Master's exile. Plus, just think about it. It just seems logical. I'm not saying that Sion would own Bandon. But he's certainly capable of defeating him.

And btw, I thought he had one death. . .

Then you seriously underestimate Maul.

How do I underestimate Maul?

You are pretty much saying Sion can beat people like Qui-Gon, Anoon Bondara, Kit Fisto, AOTC Obi-Wan, and ROTS Anakin. But Sion could take some of these people.

Well, yeah, he probably could. Qui-Gon? Anoon? Kit and Anakin are the only pretty good people here, Kit not even that much when compared to others. Anakin? Why not? He was capable of incapacitating/killing a KOTOR time Council Member.

But how powerful is that council member?

In my opinion, almost everyone with a little bit of brains cold kill Anakin. He sucks really because of all you have to do is taunt him and he will make a rash desicion which will be suicide for him.

genises, this isn't twenty questions, lol. But that Council member, having lived through two wars, was probably pretty good. Now speculation? Of course. But see Maul only killed two people worthy of notice, and although it is due to his arrogance, he got chopped in two by a padawan. That padawan Obi-Wan would become in ROTS, far better than Maul. And Sion would give him a fight, if not kill him. I'd say Sion was under Dooku, but above Maul for sure.

So your saying if Maul lived he wouldn't be as powerful as ROTS Obi-Wan.

*sigh* The fact is, Maul didn't live. This isn't "Maul if he'd lived to ROTS." This is TPM Maul. Don't complicate things, lol. Now, a Maul who'd survived 'till ROTS would be a force to be reckoned with, for sure. he'd probably be able to beat Obi-Wan, Anakin, any of the Council members save for Mace and Yoda, who'd still take him, and many others. But TPM Maul? he'd going down. Plain and simple.

Oh well its your opinion and your not changing it.

Well you haven't given me anything that can show otherwise.

Because there is only one book on him and he is on screen for like twelve minutes in TPM.

Then why do you think Maul can take Sion?