Fox vs Master Chief

Read the posts in that thread, dude. I didn't openly, or covertly direct that at you.

Ok, tell me this, since it was in reply to one of my posts, who where you directing it at? you mentioned my name in the same friggin sentence, stop trying to change the subject...

where and when??? come on darkstorm find a really good bit of evidence where some lame PS2 snake guy comes along and tells me that snake wins cause he does....

Hmm, I guess I read wrong, but I coulda sworn you JUST asked me to find evidence for a theory I don't support...

TRY AGAIN!

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25716&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=3

look at the last 2 lines on the page, I'm not tryint to change nothing....

Heh, I posted once and only once in that thread, and it was in support of MC... What's your point?

Other people may support Snake against MC, but I didn't, so why did you ask me to produce proof of a theory I don't even support?

Oh and you have changed the subject, this is Fox vs Master Cheif, not Snake vs Master Cheif...

"where and when??? come on darkstorm find a really good bit of evidence where some lame PS2 snake guy comes along and tells me that snake wins cause he does...."

I was asking here for examples where I had made mistakes.... I then said that there was a time where I got annoyed has some PS2 fanboy came along and told me that snake wins cause he does.... I then provided the link to it....

I think you've got you wires crossed... Maybe you should re-read alot of what i've said. cause I get the impression your not understanding me...

You just changed your story... first you say that you where not even talking to me. And now you want me to work for you in Identifying a PS2 Fanboy?

Geez, get real Hit...

"You just changed your story"

no, I clearly just quoted myself and then explained to you what I said.

Now your talking about identiflying a ps2 fanboy???? hello I already told you who he was.....

Ok, so if you where not directing that post at me, then say that you asked me for proof of your mistakes... Thats double sided...

Anyways, I'm wasting my time discussing this with you, your obviously not going to listen to a word I say anyways...

why should I? so far you have attacked me, started a thread to call me a fanboy and you don't even read my post well enough to understand what I'm trying to tell you...

Your not making yourself clear, i did not make that thread for you or any one person, I have not attacked you directly (So far I have not once called you an idiot or twit like you have called me more than once), What I have attacked is your flawed reasoning in jumping t conclusions.

"What I have attacked is your flawed reasoning in jumping to conclusions."

Yet you can't prove my conclusions wrong... Show me where...(quote plz) where I've been wrong.

Just like the start. You wrongly presummed I didn't know who fox was.. not I....

What you should have done is ask for clarification, not This...

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
MC, need no debate.

Cause MC wins against Fox.... It doesn't need debating.

And this is the problem, which "Fox" and what "Circumstances"

If it is indeed Fox Macleod, then the Circumstances are "Piloting" in which Fox easily wins, or on the "Ground" where MC clearly wins.

What I am asking for is clarification first before jumping on the bandwagon.

NO darkstorm.... You have to believe in the assumtions...

When ever I plug my keyboard in, I ask myself... Am I ready for the fight ahead of me???

So I carry on fighting for the sake of fighting for MC....

Most fights on this forum don't give circumstances.... So presumtion and fanboyism is your best weapon 😉

See, we've been aguing over something thats not clear... 😕 I really wish people would be more clear in what they where trying to communicate... it would make things a HECK of a lot easier... (I must be getting too old for this...)

The Master Cheif. 💃