Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
show me a damn vampire. i challenge any vampire to confront me and suck my blood.
Ok alow me to attack the heart now, I know you are a cathollic yes? and durin the spanish inqusitions 1,000's were killed for being vampires by cathollics, these cathollics were pretty blood thirsty to do so, through out history cathollics have procicuted many for being shall we say.... different, your religion now a days tells you that vampires don;t exist but they have killed 1,000's for being vampires.
Originally posted by Filth
Ok alow me to attack the heart now, I know you are a cathollic yes? and durin the spanish inqusitions 1,000's were killed for being vampires by cathollics, these cathollics were pretty blood thirsty to do so, through out history cathollics have procicuted many for being shall we say.... different, your religion now a days tells you that vampires don;t exist but they have killed 1,000's for being vampires.
Most your arguements sound as if they came out of Vampire the Masquerade or some poorly written pen and paper game 😬
SO if the Inquisition killed thousand of women for being "witches" that means witches existed/exist right? I guess the fact that they called people that owned BOOKS witches has nothing to do with it either right? Don't invoke the holy "inquisition" card if you can't play it.
In case you need layman's terms, people that owned books were called witches and killed. People that were a nuisance from either a political or administrative point of view were pointed out to as "witches" or "vampires", a corrupt priest (easy to find) and voila.....thousands of dead vampires and witches......... 😬
~wickerman~
Re: Re: Re: The Real Truth of Vampires
Originally posted by Wickerman
1 on 1 crappy history? 😬Please give me an official link or reference for the steaming crap in that post 👆
~wickerman~
ps: sorry if i sound offensive, but i've been in waaaaaaaay too many Vlad the Impaler discussions over the years.
No links. But history books about Dracula [or Vlad the Impaler, whichever you prefer], thanks.
You dont sound offensive. I've heard worse.
Originally posted by Filth
The point i was making is that his Catholic "religions" has changed its views, I do love the way religion can't stand to be wrong (though it was right in my belief)
Religion was correct in using its status to hold back evolution during the Dark Ages? 😬 You DO know they were called the DARK AGES because evolution from all points was brought to a standpoint mostly due to the influence of the church right? 😬
~wickerman~
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Real Truth of Vampires
Originally posted by carnival_junkie
No links. But history books about Dracula [or Vlad the Impaler, whichever you prefer], thanks.You dont sound offensive. I've heard worse.
Find more reliable history books then 😬 . Dracula means nothing. Dracul means the devil in romanian/transylvanian. It was also the nickname of Vlad the Impaler's father. He belonged to an order of knights called knights of the dragon. But seeing as how translating from latin was a b1tch back then, they turned draco into dracu (which means devil). Try reading why Vlad the Impaler was said to drink the blood of the innocent. You'll find out those were stories made by merchants. You see, Vlad the Impaler, son of Vlad Dracul was the one responsible for imposing incredibly high taxes on merchants trying to bring stuff into Transylvania. Therefore, they said "He sucked their blood" as a metaphore for the money he asked for. etc........etc.........etc........
~wickerman~