Was batman 4 that bad

Started by DarkAge3 pages

Re: Re: Was batman 4 that bad

Originally posted by TheVileOne
Yes it was,don't be stupid.

Lol, word, tell it like it is. When my ex said she liked this movie it was one of the last nails in the coffin. I split up with her like a week later.

Re: Re: Was batman 4 that bad

Originally posted by TheVileOne
Yes it was,don't be stupid.

Vileone don't be a bich an just answer properly or you going to have more problems with me ho!! 😮‍💨

Re: Re: Re: Was batman 4 that bad

Originally posted by DarkAge
Lol, word, tell it like it is. When my ex said she liked this movie it was one of the last nails in the coffin. I split up with her like a week later.

Why the hell would you break up with your ex just because she liked the movie ? What the f*ck wrong with you! 😮‍💨

Originally posted by lil pimp
Why the hell would you break up with your ex just because she liked the movie ? What the f*ck wrong with you! 😮‍💨

Well its a horrible movie...a really really horrible movie...and he said it was the LASt nail in the coffin...implying there was more wrong with the relationship.

Yeah, what he said.

Originally posted by lil pimp
do ya feel the same about batman forever?Couse I still love that movie!

I agree with everybody here that are dishing Batman and Robin because just about every bat fan agrees that THAT one sucked. However I agree with you that Batman Forever wasnt a bad movie.I think Schumacher gets way too much unfair criticism especially since Batman Forever was the most loyal to the Batman comics of all the Burton and Schumacher Batman movies that were made.Batman Forever is the best of the Batman movies as far as the Burton and Schumacher Batman movies go and unlike Batman and Robin,I dont see it at all being a kiddies movie.It was very adult themed.

Both Schumacher movies suck. When I was a kid, I liked them, I still think forever is ok, at least.

Well, I guess the only Schumacher movie I think is good is Lost Boys.

No way can Schmacher make a good movie like the Lost Boys.

Not unless this was the TIME before he was a fame dirctor, and he HAD TO MAKE GOOD MOVIES to put food on the table.

Than all of a sudden, He was rich. and He was making Batman Forever and Batman and Robin, and he saw $$$$$$$$ Signs. And forgot to make a good movie in the process.

Batman and Robin is a perfect example that everytime Batgirl is introduced.....the magic disappears. Joker did a great job by shooting her in the comics.

But then were are my favorite boobies. 😄

Originally posted by Bat Dude
Both Schumacher movies suck. When I was a kid, I liked them, I still think forever is ok, at least.

Well, I guess the only Schumacher movie I think is good is Lost Boys.

"A Time to Kill" was another GOOD Schumacher film.

I went to the midnight showing of "Batman Forever" and HATED it! I was in my 20's...I couldn't figure out why I hated it sooooo much and went back and noticed that they changed the Elfman Theme and that ruined a lot of the action scenes to me. Like when the Batmobile went up the wall in the alley.....it should have had that theme....also the nipples, the "I'll get drive thru" remark, Kidman's Chase using the Bat-signal to go after Batman...all of it just really kind of sucked..including Carrey's WAY over the top performance, the neon colors...ugh! I could go on and on!

Then I went to see "Batman & Robin"....OMFG!!! It made "Forever" look like a good movie! After that...I have never seen any Schumacher film again for fear it would turn out horribly.
I don't see how any of those films resemble the comics?? Batman is supposed to be dark...he does not drop one liners "Trying to get under my cape Doctor?"..WTF was that!

I prefer the Burton flicks way more to the Schumacher ones....he made it dark and gothic and Batman felt more like a real person than some jokey moron in a Batsuit.

Ok...I'm done ranting.

Carey's performance was great he didn't make riddler a boring guy plus all you people look at is the damn nipples at least the second costume didnt have nipples you nipple haters and all that neon sh*t was trying to make it look different and not the same as everything else I noticed you people like everything the same thank god none of ya make movies and those of you who say batman was a dark character he is but not all the damn time in the cartoon series and some comic books he isnt that dark and those lines like" trying to get under my cape Doctor" i thought were good showed batman had a sense of humor . Ya just to damn serious i mean the movie was mostly for a younger audience lighten up!!!!

Lil Pimp, no it was not made for a younger audience. It was rated PG-13. And I consider 13 year olds not that young. Oh and...BATMAN DOESN'T HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR! If he did, he wouldn't be Batman, he would be Superman in a Batman costume! And yes Batman was dark in BTAS. And yes Carey sucked as Riddler. And yes Forever and B&R sucked. Period.

Like i said ya are to damn serious lighten up if batman is dark hes dark if hes not hes not, riddler was great period

and why ya so mad he was not as dark, you know what i loved it and thats all i need to know if ya didnt like BF i dont give a shit!!! PEACE

Mr. Freeze was a hilarious character lol, weapon of choice being puns.

Arnie is one of my favourite actors neverthelss hehehe.

Mr. Freeze was hilarious!!! Weapon of choice being puns lol.

Arnie is one of my favourite actors tho, nonetheless

4 was an abortion of a movie,it was what the 60's movie would be if they had a huge budget and technology. if one were to equate movies to sex, this one's a retrograde ejaculation (when your dick backfires into your bladder)

It was horrible!

Clooney was the best Bruce Wayne, i'll give him that. But he was also the Worst Batman, so he was a bad choice.

Script sucked, casting sucke, plot sucked, and what they did to Bane sucked

IMDB rated it the worst sequel ever created.

True that.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I agree with everybody here that are dishing Batman and Robin because just about every bat fan agrees that THAT one sucked. However I agree with you that Batman Forever wasnt a bad movie.I think Schumacher gets way too much unfair criticism especially since Batman Forever was the most loyal to the Batman comics of all the Burton and Schumacher Batman movies that were made.Batman Forever is the best of the Batman movies as far as the Burton and Schumacher Batman movies go and unlike Batman and Robin,I dont see it at all being a kiddies movie.It was very adult themed.
Batman and Robin had multiple suits, Robin was I Wonder Why Joel Schumacher Casted A Man, ass shots, Batman revieled his identity again to a third random bat bimbo, Gotham City in Bright Neon Colors, Riddler and Two Face were fakeout Jokers unlike their comic books counterparts, nipples. WHAT THE HELL YOU TALKING ABOUT!??

Originally posted by lil pimp
Carey's performance was great he didn't make riddler a boring guy plus all you people look at is the damn nipples at least the second costume didnt have nipples you nipple haters and all that neon sh*t was trying to make it look different and not the same as everything else I noticed you people like everything the same thank god none of ya make movies and those of you who say batman was a dark character he is but not all the damn time in the cartoon series and some comic books he isnt that dark and those lines like" trying to get under my cape Doctor" i thought were good showed batman had a sense of humor . Ya just to damn serious i mean the movie was mostly for a younger audience lighten up!!!!
It's called a "Sequel", ho. Sequels need to be like the movie before it otherwise it is sloppy and inconsistent. That is why BATMAN FOREVER should have been with Micheal Keaton without Robin or a batbimbo with The Riddler and Two Face who are truer to the comic directed by Tim Burton with some kind of CLOSURE at the end. After that you start a NEW triology of the same kind of movie with all the neon lights and nipples, you nipple ****er!