Jesse Custer with time to speak a sentence v The One Above All

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Ahh because to see all does not mean to experience all 🙂

Neither does Omnipotence or Omnipresence 😂

How can someone that's omnipresent not experience something?

How can someone that's omniscient not know what it's like to experience something?

How can someone who's omnipotent not have a safe guard, like being able to project himself out?

Omnipresent only means being everywhere not experience or everything

Omniscient means seeing everything and knowing everything in some explanations. Knowledge is not necessarily experience. Certainly not when divinity and mortality are concerned 🙂

So you can be somewhere without experienceing something?

You can know exactly what something is like but that's not having the experience?

No, still sounds like PIS for God to want to leave to experience something.

Originally posted by Creshosk
So you can be somewhere without experienceing something?

You can know exactly what something is like but that's not having the experience?

No, still sounds like PIS for God to want to leave to experience something.

Not really of course you can be somewhere and not experience it - Voyeaurism at the sit in the corner and watch in an orgy level. 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Not really of course you can be somewhere and not experience it - Voyeaurism at the sit in the corner and watch in an orgy level. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
So you actually have to be somewhere doing something in order to know what its like?

I think so - till then your still a virgin 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I think so - till then your still a virgin 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
But if you already know what its like, why would you want to experience something that might wind up with you being beaten?

I don't know 🙂 I'm not into S and M ask anyone who reads The Marquis De Sade. 🙂

Can you say plot device to explore esoteric and philosphical ideas in America's original art form the comic book?

🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I don't know I'm not into S and M ask anyone who reads The Marquis De Sade. 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Can you say plot device to explore esoteric and philosphical ideas in America's original art form the comic book?

🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Don't have to, I'm quite familar with his works. What's funny is some people actually think that some of his stories were intended to arouse, but they seemed more like a satire of human nature.

They arouse some people. 🙂 Your into th Marquis are you😉

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
They arouse some people. 🙂 Your into th Marquis are you😉

He was simply ahead of his time. . . of course nowaday nobody we really pay attention to him and give him the notoriety that he got back then . . .

Originally posted by Creshosk
Actually I got interested in his works because he was controversial. So I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.

He was simply ahead of his time. . . of course nowaday nobody we really pay attention to him and give him the notoriety that he got back then . . .

True enough its all pretty tame really compared to today's stuff 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
True enough its all pretty tame really compared to today's stuff 🙂

And is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Originally posted by Creshosk
As are most things that were shocking and controversial in the past. . .of course then without those would we be where we are today?

And is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Are a question for the GDF imo. 🙂

im glad the preacher gets some love.

bout time 🙂

Originally posted by Pointinel
im glad the preacher gets some love.

bout time 🙂

True enough 🙂

so this is the word of god vs god and the word is absolute.and god(TOAA)is all powerful. so its all powerful vs absolute.jesse could tell him to cease to exist i suppose. however god did bite his eye out when jesse tried using the word on him.so i give this to TOAA.

It's a paradox that hasn't officially been brought up as such.

I mean the closest we've heard of is the immovable object versus the irresistible force.

But what about two omnipotents fighting each other. . .

Makes you wonder what the point of this thread was 😖hifty:

🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Makes you wonder what the point of this thread was 😖hifty:

🙂

It's a nice attempt but some people just don't comprehensively read a thread.

I very much suspect that every thread has a person who has made one post then never been back to see what was said.

I learned more about him though so it's not a total loss.