Originally posted by a1hsauce
okay hold up...so circumcision on the other side of the ocean isnt a big deal?... Europe doesnt have that practice? thats what im hearing so far....
I wonder why the US holds that as a big deal
For the same reason Europe doesn't; differences in lifestyle, culture and belief.
Originally posted by a1hsauce
okay hold up...so circumcision on the other side of the ocean isnt a big deal?... Europe doesnt have that practice? thats what im hearing so far....
I wonder why the US holds that as a big deal
America puts more emphasis on appearances than anywhere else. Dental treatment, plastic surgery, etc. The US is the pioneer when it comes to artificially alterring the human body into a mishapen mess of fakeness.
Originally posted by Syren
For the same reason Europe doesn't; differences in lifestyle, culture and belief.
Originally posted by Syren
I assumed the healthier option would be to leave the skin where it is. After all, it's there for a reason, right? ๐
Originally posted by Lana
Even in the US that belief and trend is starting to go, I think.
Well, the penis does adjust when the skin is removed. It becomes less sensitive due to the head becoming more "tough".
There are pros and cons of each.
Cons of circumcision:
- Less protection - head of the penis takes some wear and tear.
- Less sensation - Not as much fun for the man
Pro's of circumcision:
- Less sensation - better for the female I guess. Those who can't go at it very long will have a bit of help.
- Less to clean - NOT CLEANER, but it would certainly cut out that precious ten seconds it takes to clean an uncircumcised penis ๐
- More attractive to shallow bimbo's who get squeamish towards natural bodily things.
That last one is more of a con, in my opinion.