Originally posted by Bardock42
Well I personally belief that being attacked doesn't necessarily mean that you will vote for someone who will make it more likely to happen again....
I can see how you don't like Bush, but you have to admit, we havn't had another terror attack four all his terms..
When Clinton was in office, we had SEVERAL attacks on the petegon, they just weren't comparible to 9/11. Bush is from Texas, they NEVER look the other way.
I personaly wouldn't have gone into this war neither. It's ALOT of work, and those damn Middle-Easterns are never going to change, but Bush is alot like my mom. Once you piss them off, they're going to do thier thing and nothing less then God smiting him or her is going to stop them.
I dread our next election, I hate Hillary for her Hitleresque persona. She simply stayed with Clinton who was an absolute dog just so she could get publicity, she wants that seat of power BADLY. I fear for this country should she ever get it.
And what do the Republicans do? They simply counter with ANOTHER woman. Because clearly the American people don't care about the intelligence or intentions of a canidate, simply how it's comparible socialy! Hell, they should've tried getting Collen Powell, then give the people a REAL choice of a whole new social climate!
But this woman the Republicans have.. she's a bafoon! She can't even keep her speech papers together. Why didn't Ann Rice run? She's probably more involved in this whole thing then the president himself is..
Infact, this country would be alot better off without democrats AND republicans.. The independants are scatterd, though I try, I don't think I could ever convince them to fuse into one gigantic platform to rival the two big dogs. Despite how it's ussualy the independant voter who has a head on thier shoulders..