-=- Towns Shouldn't Have To live Like This -=-

This is a hard one to decide. In a way I have absolutely no concern for the pedophile's life or the danger he might get into. But at the same time I feel the town is violating the citizens private life. Even if that citizen has a terrible criminal record. I dunno...this one looks like a 50/50 to me.

Originally posted by WindDancer
This is a hard one to decide. In a way I have absolutely no concern for the pedophile's life or the danger he might get into. But at the same time I feel the town is violating the citizens private life. Even if that citizen has a terrible criminal record. I dunno...this one looks like a 50/50 to me.

Well I don't care for the Pedophile, I just think a Country has to stick to their own rules to not get unstable.......

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah i see....Once you are found a Jew shame on you....twice you are found a jew a star should do......for the third I don't know a Rhyme but you get the picture....fascist...

Will you quit calling me a fascist.....My ancestors only killed Jesus...Romans, you know....But we had permission from the Jews....They said it was OK.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Will you quit calling me a fascist.....My ancestors only killed Jesus...Romans, you know....But we had permission from the Jews....They said it was OK.

Well I'm a gypsy, actually half Rom and I find branding people pretty offensive as a result.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
People throw the term paedophile around way too easily and they shouldn't.

It's dangerous.

-AC

Agreed excellent post

Originally posted by Acherontia
Everybody knows he harmed, he just doesn't have *enough* proof against him.

how do you know if there's not enough proof against him?

If it's a first-time offender, no way. The jail time plus being registered as a sex offender is punishment enough.

Plus it makes your city officials look like idiots.

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Probably slanderous, I hate hate campaigns in the uk we had anti paedophile riots this some of of the ridiculous things that happened:

The residents of the Paulsgrove estate in Portsmouth drew up a "mental list" of the 20 most likely paedophiles in their neighbourhood. They set about attacking the homes of those on the list. They admitted to suspecting one man because he lived alone and talked about how much he loved his mother. A 17-year-old boy was included because his girlfriend was 15. The protesters paraded their children for the cameras. A three-year-old held up a sign as if she was supporting her village fete. It read: "Kill Paedophiles!" Five innocent families fled the estate, terrified of their neighbours. The campaign's self-proclaimed leader, Katrina Kessell, declared that if they felt compelled to run away because of guilty thoughts then it was their own fault. It was during one of her many TV interviews that Kessell's three-year-old son was found wandering near a busy road half-a-mile from their home. Social services was alerted.

The crowds - 40 of whom were later charged with offences - smashed windows, torched cars and forced five families wrongly identified as harbouring sex offenders out of their homes. A suspected paedophile in nearby Southampton shot himself dead and a female registrar was hounded from her South Wales home because neighbours confused "paediatrician" with "paedophile."

lots more stupidity here:-

http://society.guardian.co.uk/children/story/0,1074,618198,00.html

the media in the UK criticise these people for taking these actions on one hand...and on the other...stir up hatred and violence against them in what they write...an irony there i think...

good articles though

Well I'm a gypsy, actually half Rom and I find branding people pretty offensive as a result.

Originally posted by finti
branding them as jew for a jew or a gypsy for a gypsy or that a sexual deviating molestor gets a mark in his/hers forehead as a punishment for his/her crimes?

No in a civilised society people lose their liberty for crimes committed, and when the sentence has been serve they deserve the right to try and make ammends without a "mark" placed upon them. Returning to the middle ages is not a good plan.

Returning to the middle ages is not a good plan.

Originally posted by finti
in certain areas and about certain things it would actually be a good plan

no, it really wouldn't

Originally posted by finti
in certain areas and about certain things it would actually be a good plan

Where?

no it really wouldn't

Originally posted by finti
you have your opinion I have mine.

I have my question you should have your answer.....now.....😐

Originally posted by Bardock42
I have my question you should have your answer.....now.....😐

😂

entertaining

Originally posted by Bardock42
Fascist.

ohwait...why do that, let's just put them all in a train to nowhere...my god, imagine the work force we'll have if we could do that. why stop there, lets operate on their brains to see what makes them tick...oh oh oh...who needs animal for testing when we've got such disposable resource....

sometimes i wonder who's sicker in the head: the paeds or the people that fear them.

Originally posted by finti
in certain areas and about certain things it would actually be a good plan

It would make a great deterrent for other who are seeking to do the same thing...

✅

Originally posted by Fëanor
omg! i agree...people obviously never learn from history or the past.

ohwait...why do that, let's just put them all in a train to nowhere...my god, imagine the work force we'll have if we could do that. why stop there, lets operate on their brains to see what makes them tick...oh oh oh...who needs animal for testing when we've got such disposable resource....

sometimes i wonder who's sicker in the head: the paeds or the people that fear them.

good post

Where?