Originally posted by Maestro
There's a comic, before he got his upgrade off the high E, that Hulk actually caught quicksilver pretty easily, so surface to say this would be pretty easy for the Hulkster.
he dosent need to be faster then him......to catch him....he just need to have fast reflexes.....and good timing thats all....batman once cought flash.does that mean he is faster then flash?
Originally posted by Draco69no, muscle does not equal speed people. it helps in propelling but in terms of running it comes down to how quickly the neurotransmitters can trigger the muscles to move. Quicksilver sends the information much quicker to his legs and his muscles are developed enough to allow him to keep up. In Hulks case his muscles are much more than necessary to maintain such speeds but his body does not respond that quickly and he cannot keep sending the signal to run to his legs as quickly. If you take away his jumping then he loses IMO.
Because he doesn't have the cognitive abilities to withstand such speeds.
Originally posted by long pig
Quicksilver can only run fast because his running muscles are disproportionately strong.
Hulk's are that times 100 million.Hulk -should- be capable of running way past sound.
Originally posted by colossus17
and yet he dosent.....
The Hulk can't run that fast, because he would sink into the ground due to his weight, and the torque that he'd exhibit in his strides. This is exactly why he has to jump. I'd also assume that guys weighing as much as Thor and up would have similar problems. As for him taking off as fast as Pietro? Physically the Hulk's muscular twitch fibers should be far superior to Quicksilver's, and he should therefore achieve far higher initial burst speeds, due to the enormous strength difference. If we could assume that they were running on an indestructible super highway, I wouldn't, or better yet couldn't see why the Hulk wouldn't beat Quicksilver in this cross country race by at least 12 hours.
