-=- National Geographic Predicted Katrina! -=-
Link to October 2004 Website
-=- National Geographic Predicted Katrina! -=-
Link to October 2004 Website
Civil Engineers Magazine predicted it before National Geographic in 2003. 😐
On basis of:
1)Sea level rising.
2)Global Warming.
3) Lack of upgrade to old levvis that could only withstand hurricanes and floods of 60's ; The design of the original levees, which dates to the 1960s, was based on rudimentary storm modeling that, it is now realized, might underestimate the threat of a potential hurricane. Even if the modeling was adequate, however, the levees were designed to withstand only forces associated with a fast-moving hurricane that, according to the National Weather Service’s Saffir-Simpson scale, would be placed in category 3. If a lingering category 3 storm—or a stronger storm, say, category 4 or 5—were to hit the city, much of New Orleans could find itself under more than 20 ft (6 m) of water.
Click Here for detailed historical facts.
They've always known this was gonna happen, and they knew how to prevent the leevees from failing.
What was the problem then? $14 billion . No adminsitration since the 70's saw the need to spend that kind of money in New Orleans. Cheap a$$ pr|cks
Shame on them, cause its gonna cost TONS MORE to fix the city now.
Wow, so people ACTAULLY take CNN seriously? I don't mean to offend anybody *snicker* but I thought it was clearly obvious that most of CNN (including Weather reports on occassions) Was just a flamming Pile of cr@p.
Now back to the topic of how it cost 14 billion some To have prevented this... to some extent, and how Iraq costs 6 million a week.