Too many troops?
Too many troops?
While speaking to Sean Hannity, Donald Rumsfeld was discussing troop levels in response to the criticism that we are thin on troops and National Guard that could have help with Katrina because of the war in Iraq. He says that we actually have too many troops in certain areas...Rumsfeld: We do not have a shortage of capability. Today there are hundreds of thousands of guard and reserve people who are still available and aren't being used in this. Indeed, there is some areas where we today very well have excess capacity and we may have to make adjustments in that as we go forward..."
I bring this up because of a few reasons:
If there are hundreds of thousands of guard and reserve people who are still available, than why weren't they mobilized for Katrina?
If there are hundreds of thousands of guard and reserve people who are still available, then why are they denying the forces in the Iraq troops or the relief of troops currently serving there?
If there are hundreds of thousands of guard and reserve people who are still available, how much money is being sunk into forces that just aren't being used?
Finally, it seems in recent weeks the press has let be ascertained that the U.S. troop deployment is starting to get a little thin. Yet, Rummy states," Indeed, there is some areas where we today very well have excess capacity and we may have to make adjustments in that as we go forward..."
I just thought all this was interesting. Comments?