Dr. Hannibal Lecter vs Batman I.Q Test

Started by golem3702 pagesPoll

Dr. Hannibal Lecter vs Batman I.Q Test

Dr. Hannibal Lecter vs Batman I.Q Test

Who is Smarter?

With respect to Bruce, Lecter wins.
As it's written in The Silence Of The Lambs, Clarice Starling sat across from Dr. Lecter: "One of them extremely bright, the other not measurable by any means known to man."

Yeah....I think Bruce's IQ has been quoted as being between 150-160( i thnk this is pretty modest considering what we know he has done and what we know he knows), id have to say a more accute gage of his IQ would be somewhere above 200. I say that the three smartest mortals in DC earth are, Bruce Wayne, Slade Wilson and Lex Luthore.

Originally posted by eL sTanKo
Yeah....I think Bruce's IQ has been quoted as being between 150-160( i thnk this is pretty modest considering what we know he has done and what we know he knows), id have to say a more accute gage of his IQ would be somewhere above 200. I say that the three smartest mortals in DC earth are, Bruce Wayne, Slade Wilson and Lex Luthore.
220 I think I saw it as somewhere. . .

and batman one million had an IQ over 1000 I think. . .

Genius level is 140 and up...

I don't remember mine but it was higher than that though...

I remember what mine is at least. . . Don't know what it is for certain. . . But I know what it's said to be based on what I did complete.

Not that it matters though, people inaccuratly use it as a way to determine inteligence. and thats fine for things such as games where "IQ" plays a significant meaning. However it is mostly just a measurement of how well you learn.

There isn't a really good way to measure what intelligence really is, as thereare more than one type of inteligence. Book smarts, Tactile thinking, creative inteligence, problem solving. etc. etc. etc. where a person might be a genius in one of these feilds they might not do so hot in others.

Of course this is also the best (read: only) way we have, and really only measures book smarts. But the truth of these lands is often replaced by cinsensus when it comes to definitions of words. . . Ah well. . .

I love his little tangents.

How do you feel about idiot savants? 😛

Unfortunately Batman has "EVERYTHING" smarts. Dear God, he seems to know everything about everything.

about everything.

Nice sig and avatar btw.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
I love his little tangents.
Well this thread is rather pointless and will probably be closed, due to Hannibal not being a major comic book character, and no way to determine the outcome do to being so vauge, and even with official statements that would certianly render any debate impossible anyway.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
How do you feel about idiot savants? 😛
*shrugs* I don't feel any particular way about groups that one can't control being organized into.

Originally posted by Draco69
Unfortunately Batman has "EVERYTHING" smarts. Dear God, he seems to know everything about everything.
That's why 220 seems rather low to me. . . I mean for the most part I know of two characters that are also supposed to be geniuses, but never pull off what Batman does, and have IQ's of 300. . .

dude calm down, I liked your point, no need to explain...

have you read get fuzzy?

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
dude calm down, I liked your point, no need to explain...
I am calm, which is why I'm tangenting all to hell in the firstplace, I just go where my mind wanders and keep babbling on.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
have you read get fuzzy?
You mean the comic strip? 😂

You mean like a thread about Bruce Lee not being a major comic book person.

If Lecter was so smart, why did he end up in prison ? And Lecter only has some booksmartness and a few psychological moves, while Batman has much more than that.

[QUOTE=4972624]Originally posted by who?-kid
If Lecter was so smart, why did he end up in prison ? And Lecter only has some booksmartness and a few psychological moves, while Batman has much more than that. [/QUOTE

If Batman is so smart, how come he always puts a child in danger (Robin)to fight crime?

Originally posted by roughrider
If Batman is so smart, how come he always puts a child in danger (Robin)to fight crime?

I wouldn't call him just a child... he can kick your ass and your brothers ass at the same time... maybe even mine lol.

Actually the smartest people are in jail, believe it or not...

I know ALOT about people in jail.

Originally posted by roughrider
[QUOTE=4972624]Originally posted by who?-kid
[B]If Lecter was so smart, why did he end up in prison ? And Lecter only has some booksmartness and a few psychological moves, while Batman has much more than that.
[/QUOTE

If Batman is so smart, how come he always puts a child in danger (Robin)to fight crime? [/B]

The psychological damage of knowing you got your ass kicked by a kid.

Besides training these kids to be able to defend themselves is hardly what I'd call stupid.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Actually the smartest people are in jail, believe it or not...

I know ALOT about people in jail.

People in jail are smart, but I'd say the smartest are ouside taking full advantage of our current systems to make themselves happy.

You don't need to acomplish great things to be happy either though.