The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

Originally posted by lord xyz

IF Deano can show me facts that says I'm wrong and a missle hit the pentagon, then I shall admit I'm wrong. But so far, all I've got is ignorance, rhetoric questions, and insults. To me, there's too much evidence for the plane than against it, that's why I'm for Flight 77. No evidence says it was something else apart from... the lawn. But people don'tr realise when things explode they go up first and then fall many minutes later.
"[/i]

you deserve insults, you do nothing but bash people and post crap.

Originally posted by lord xyz
2 words, "Blue nocture" a lot like Deano in debates. 😂

IF Deano can show me facts that says I'm wrong and a missle hit the pentagon, then I shall admit I'm wrong. But so far, all I've got is ignorance, rhetoric questions, and insults. To me, there's too much evidence for the plane than against it, that's why I'm for Flight 77. No evidence says it was something else apart from... the lawn. But people don'tr realise when things explode they go up first and then fall many minutes later.

I'm not Anti-conspiracy, or Pro-conspiracy, I'm a fact-man. I only go by facts. That is what I do, and only stupidity gets in my way. I guess the philosophy is true: "Stupidity [b]should hurt." [/B]

where are you're facts?? oh wait you dont have any. you are the truely ignorant one. many people are searching for the truth about what happened on 9/11. you only go by facts you say, and what facts suggest that a plane hit the pentagon? none. so you made yourself stupid there.

Originally posted by Deano
and what facts suggest that a plane hit the pentagon?

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

Originally posted by Deano
you made yourself stupid there.

The irony here could choke a brachiosaurus.

Originally posted by lord xyz
[B]✅ Deano just doesn't understand words when it comes to things like this, if he was a creationist, it would make complete sense, but, people like him just make a fool of themselves and don't realise it.

show me where ive made a fool of myself please. go right ahead.

Then they fill threads up with shit. I hate it when that happens

what a complete idiot. this is a conspiracy thread, anything posted is conspiracy related. you can go home now.

thumbup*1,000! 😄 If you wanna be scientific, and a true debator, then what you just said is 100% true. And the thing about Deano is also 100% true. But this nothing compared to the ID thread 😂
again, you are right. But still, you need to see the ID thread 😂
✅ god, when you are right, YOU ARE RIGHT!!! I fully support you when it comes to future arguments with Deano. 👆

you have no idea what logic is do you?

What Would 'Flight 77' Eyewitnesses Have Actually Seen?

'What would eyewitnesses to whatever crashed into the Pentagon have actually seen? Our video analysis shows it's plausible they could have identified the jet as a large American Airlines Boeing 757, but comments about seeing intricate details of the plane as it zoomed past at over 500 MPH are outside the realm of possibility.

Here we have taken a video of an American Airliners Boeing 757-200 coming in to land at around 100 knots and speeded it up four times to represent the reported 400 knots speed of Flight 77. The altitude is slightly higher than Flight 77's reported 20-30 feet, a fact disputed by former pilots who contend that flying at high speeds 20 feet above the ground is impossible.'

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/230506actuallyseen.htm

below is the pic the pentagon released. they show fairies at the bottom of the garden

Originally posted by KharmaDog
[B]http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

untill the pentagon release a decent video. i will stand by what i think. and as ive said before. it doesnt matter if it was a plane or missile. only the people who did it.

The irony here could choke a brachiosaurus.

you love using that word in an attempt to sound good. it may work on the newcomers, but its getting old. try harder.

Originally posted by Deano
untill the pentagon release a decent video. i will stand by what i think. and as ive said before. it doesnt matter if it was a plane or missile. only the people who did it.

So until a video is produced that disproves the fabricated evidence and speculation that you believe in, you will choose to believe the fabricated evidence and speculation. An although you have no proof of anything other than flight 77 hitting the pentagon, and no reasonable explanation of what hit the pentagon other than flight 77, you will choose to believe the fabricated evidence and speculation. Excellent logic.

Originally posted by Deano
you love using that word in an attempt to sound good. it may work on the newcomers, but its getting old. try harder.

You live in a world of denial.

Deano, you have just then made a fool about yourself by saying I have no facts 😂 try checking pages 51+ I've posted facts. 😂 you are so dumb.

And incase you can't see those pages, here we go.

Originally posted by lord xyz
okay

Originally posted by lord xyz
* Review the facts
* Size of 757 matches the initial size of hole in the building - somewhere between 13 and 16 feet (757 is 13 feet wide/high)
* Rims found in building match those of a 757
* Small turbine engine outside is an APU
* Same engine has been clearly stated to not match a Global Hawk engine
* Blue seats from 757 laying on ground in photos
* Part of "American" fuselage logo visible in more than 1 photo
* Engine parts photographed inside match a Rolls-Royce RB211
* Structural components photographed in wreckage match Boeing paint primer schemes
* Large deisel generator in front of building hit by a large heavy object
* Large deisel engine outside is spun towards the building - could not be result of bomb blast or missile explosion
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner
* Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon
* 60+ bodies, matching the passenger list and flight crew roster identified and returned to families from Pentagon wreckage

edited

lol that is rather funny when u look at it.

never mind me fool hes the one getting away with ur post.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Deano, you have just then made a fool about yourself by saying I have no facts 😂 try checking pages 51+ I've posted facts. 😂 you are so dumb.

And incase you can't see those pages, here we go.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/230506actuallyseen.htm

eyewitsnesses claim they saw faces in the window. bullshit.

and could those items have been placed there on the lawn before hand, or after?

you havent produced anything at all.

when the pentagon release footage of a plane hitting the pentagon, then we can talk.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2758880303660529314&q=police%2Bstate%2Bduration%3Along&pl=true

The corrupt central government has already implemented the first stages of an oppressive Police State -- MARTIAL LAW IS HERE!

and what about that flash presentation? 🙄 critics have attacked that by being wrong on just about nearly everything.

and it's pretty funny that I've only heard about those eye-witnesses on that website. 🙄 That's the first time I've heard of ol' Cissell.

if wikipedia say it...

http://whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html

Originally posted by Deano
and could those items have been placed there on the lawn before hand, or after?

That is the most idiotic thing that you have said....ever.

I don't think so Kharma. Remember this?

Originally posted by Deano
where are you're facts?? oh wait you dont have any. you are the truely ignorant one. many people are searching for the truth about what happened on 9/11. you only go by facts you say, and what facts suggest that a plane hit the pentagon? none. so you made yourself stupid there.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
That is the most idiotic thing that you have said....ever.

i asked the question is it possible. yes it is imo.

Originally posted by Deano
i asked the question is it possible. yes it is imo.

Originally posted by Deano
i asked the question is it possible. yes it is imo.

It is still a ridiculous question. And you are ridiculous for asking it.

Is it possible that many of the conspiracey theories that you believe are perpetuated by those who profit from their existence most, such as Icke and Jones?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
It is still a ridiculous question. And you are ridiculous for asking it.

Is it possible that many of the conspiracey theories that you believe are perpetuated by those who profit from their existence most, such as Icke and Jones?

Originally posted by lord xyz
prophet. And conspiracy theories are twisted facts and beliefs. Like religion.

I think you mean profit.

And I believe that some conspiracy theories have merit, Deano just seems to go for some of the more ridiculous theories.