The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

oh Kharma dog,I made a mistake earlier back when I mentioned David Icke took Bill Clinton to court and tried to sue him but was whitewashed because the supreme court would not allow him to bring forth evidence or witnesses that were critical to the case,it was a david but it wasnt him,it was David Schippers,a lawyer in chicago who brought that case forth.He not david icke,was also the one who was representing FBI agents who were banging on the doors of attorney general john ashcroft and trying to tell him that Schippers had loads of evidence that documented plots of terrorists that were going to hijack planes to crash them into the world trade center.Schippers and the FBI agents went to both ashcroft and bush about it but both didnt want to hear it and Bush threatened them with arrest if they tried to stop it.

The book that I just got at the libraray the other day where Schippers tried to sue Bill Clinton is called SELLOUT. Theres also an interesting speel about how Bush stold the election in 2004 in the june issue of rolling stone b robert kennedy jr.the headline title reads-DID BUSH STEAL THE 2004 ELECTION? then the subheadline reads-How 350,000 votes disappeared in Ohio by Robert F Kennedy Jr.

interesting piece.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I didnt say you couldnt but when you start making so many with so many bible length posts in them even people like me get to the point where they dont want to read them anymore.

doesnt matter to me if people read them or not. it really doesnt

Originally posted by Deano
doesnt matter to me if people read them or not. it really doesnt

Then why post it and criticise people for not buying into your heap of drivel?

The world is like a ride at an amusement park. And when you choose to go on it, you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. And the ride goes up and down and round and round. It has thrills and chills and it's very brightly coloured and it's very loud and it's fun, for a while. Some people have been on the ride for a long time, and they begin to question: Is this real, or is this just a ride? And other people have remembered, and they come back to us, they say, 'Hey – don't worry, don't be afraid ever, because this is just a ride ...' And we ... kill those people. Ha ha, 'Shut him up. We have a lot invested in this ride. Shut him up. Look at my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account and my family. This just has to be real.' It's just a ride. But we always kill those good guys who try and tell us that, you ever notice that? And let the demons run amok. But it doesn't matter, because – it's just a ride. And we can change it anytime we want. It's only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings and money. A choice, right now, between fear and love. The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourself off. The eyes of love instead see all of us as one. Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money we spend on weapons and defenses each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would pay for many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace.

From whom did you copy and paste that?

bill hicks said it. he knew alot for sure.

WHAT WERE YOU DOING, DADDY ...

... WHEN THE WORLD BECAME A FASCIST STATE ...?

'Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.' - John Milton, English poet (1608-1674)

Hello all,
I was passing through Parliament Square in London recently in the heartland of British 'government'. Police were everywhere and I noticed that the now famous line of banners protesting against the Bush/Blair wars of slaughter were gone.
Brian Haw has been protesting there, opposite the Houses of Parliament, since June 2nd, 2001. His campaign started when he saw how hundreds of thousands of children were dying as a direct result of the British and American sanctions against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, but after the attacks of 9/11 the protest widened to the whole bogus 'war on terror'. For more than five years he has been there in all weathers and situations and his commitment is incredible. But standing so publicly for peace makes you powerful enemies among the dark suits at the dark heart of government.

Brian Haw ... for five years he has refused to be silenced ...

When I found Brian among a group of supporters and journalists he told me that nearly 80 police officers had marched into the square like Hitler's Brownshirts at around 3 am that morning and taken down all his banners and pictures of dead and suffering children.
Brian has provided a constant reminder of what is really happening in Afghanistan and Iraq and who the real terrorists are. Tony Blair has been trying to remove him from the start and many attempts have been made, all of which had been thwarted. Blair's gofers tried to claim that he was obstructing the pavement (not true) and that his placards were 'illegal advertising'. How desperate their arguments were to stop a man's freedom to protest at mass murder.

The protest against the slaughter of children was removed by police

In May 2004, the police came in the middle of the night and tore down the placards after telling Brian that he had to leave the area because there was a 'suspicious car' parked nearby. It was all an obvious lie and he was arrested and injured when he refused to leave. Once they had forced him to go they moved in to trash his protest. All this coincided with a visit to London by the Chinese Prime Minister with whom Blair was supposed to have talked about 'human rights'. Injustice is not without a sense of irony. After the meeting of monsters had transpired, Brian's broken placards were 'returned'.
I was in London at the time filming with an American team and we captured the before and after scenes when a peaceful protest was destroyed by a violent police imposing the will of the war criminal down the road in Downing Street.

After the policemen called in 'free' Britain ...

A year later, in April 2005, Blair's pathetic poodles in parliament voted for a new law specifically aimed at removing Brian and his protest. It was introduced as part of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act. Get that. They were seeking to remove a single peaceful protestor against mass murder through legislation apparently aimed at 'serious organised crime'.
The act bans all protest within one kilometre of parliament without the permission of the police. The Metropolitan Police Commissioner - appointed by the government - has to be given six days notice and he decides if a protest can go ahead and what restrictions are imposed upon it. Loudspeakers are banned, except for those used by police.

Brian took the case to court and he won temporary exemption from the law because the judge said it applied only to protests that started after the legislation was passed. Existing protests were not subject to its restrictions.
But the Blair Home Office, using taxpayers money, of course, so they have limitless funds to deny freedom, won an appeal against the verdict and on May 23rd the police launched the 3 am raid to remove his protest. Yet again his display of words and images exposing the real cost of the war on terror was taken apart by the forces of infamy.
The head of police, Ian Blair, for whom truth is a rare companion, even lied about how much the raid had cost. He said it was £7,000 when the real cost was officially nearly £30,000 and almost certainly far more. If the chief of police is not honest, and the evidence that he isn't is legion, what chance is there for the rest of the force? But then that's the way the structure works. It is a pyramid of lies and deceit from top to bottom with decent, honest, police officers being squeezed out by the week.

Parliament Square, May 23rd, 2006. Freedom of speech under police guard.

What B-liar said in 2002 ...at the time he spoke these words the authorities were already seeking to remove Brian Haw

The story of Brian Haw is in so many ways the story of how basic freedoms have been devastated since the manufactured attacks of September 11th. The scale of destruction is now reaching staggering proportions all over the world and there is more to come unless we unite in mass non-cooperation with the system of control. When you have a 'Serious Organised Crime' Act being used to stop peaceful protest how much further can we sink into the fascist abyss? Once again, think about that. Peaceful protest is now a 'serious organised crime'.
Maya Anne Evans, a 25-year-old vegan cook from Hastings, was arrested and charged with a breach of Section 132 of the Act for reading out the names of soldiers killed in Iraq at the Cenotaph memorial near Downing Street. It was inside the one kilometre protest exclusion zone around parliament and she had not given the London police commissioner six days notice for him to decide if she could protest. Therefore she was guilty under the Serious Organised Crime Act.

Maya Evans: 'I just think it's a shame that you can't voice your freedom of speech in this country any more and it is illegal to hold a remembrance ceremony for the dead.'

We are now seeing in the attitude and response of 'law enforcement' still more confirmation of how deeply the fascism is becoming ingrained in daily life. When I was in Parliament Square with Brian Haw the morning after the raid last month a police chief turned up to hand him a letter. In tow were his underlings in their luminous jackets, including one taking video footage of everyone there (hope he got my good side). The demeanour of the luminous small fry was especially cold and callous.
Law enforcement so often attracts the wrong people because of the power that goes with it. If you are imbalanced enough to seek power over others then law enforcement must look very attractive. You don't have to be intelligent, nor honest, nor fair. You just need to wear the right clothes. Donning a uniform is the ultimate in power-dressing.
The people involved have no power in themselves. When they remove their uniform they remove their power, as they do permanently when they leave the job. Their power resides only in the uniform which, itself, is an extension of the power of the state and the few who dictate events

The uniform, and those inside, are appendages of the State. The dictionary definition of 'appendage' is 'an external body part that projects from the body'. That is what law enforcement officers are in relation to the State

In fact, it goes further. Those in uniform are powerless if they do anything more than impose the will of those who control government. Thinking for yourself is not a good career move.
I asked the police officer who delivered the letter to Brian Haw if he saw any irony in the fact that Tony Blair, a man who provably lied to justify the slaughter of the innocent in Iraq and Afghanistan, is protected by armed police from those who peacefully protest against such war crimes, while, at the same time, the peaceful protestors are constantly hassled by the same police. Did the officer ever think about such contradictions? No reply. I asked him what his actions had to do with policing freedom and 'democracy'. His reply was telling: 'I am policing the law'.
Ah, yes, 'the law'.
This is one of the key ways that democracy is equated with freedom when the two are not the same thing. The sequence goes like this: Hidden forces introduce laws through their puppet presidents and prime ministers and then the entire army of law enforcement from police to military to traffic wardens and council officials impose those laws on the people.
All you have to do is control the law and the whole vast law enforcement apparatus makes sure the people comply even if the law is unjust, callous and criminal in its intent and outcome. As the officer said, he is there to 'police the law', not protect the rights of the people. Look at the language here. They don't call themselves freedom enforcement or democracy enforcement, but law enforcement. The law of the dictatorship

Another fundamental sign of a police state is when laws imposed on the people do not apply to those imposing them. I was in Parliament Square this week with a crew from the UK's Channel 5 shooting a documentary about my work. Within no more than a minute of arriving, two police officers appeared to ask what we were doing and if we had written permission to film in this supposedly public place.
I began to question them about what business it was of theirs what we filmed peacefully in a public location. Our camera was rolling while this was going on and the lady police officer twice put her hand over the lens and demanded that we stop filming. We didn't, but the point is that when I had been near the same spot with Brian Haw only two weeks earlier a policeman had put a camera in my face for some 20 minutes or so. What is okay for the State enforcers is not okay for the people who pay their wages

...Yep ...

We see this all the time across the world and it goes to far greater extremes of double standards. Terrorists who ordered the bombing of a major city and carried out that order would be jailed for life or executed. But not Bush and Blair and not those who bomb, maim and murder on their behalf. Far from being arrested they are protected from peaceful protest and we are told we should 'support our troops'. Support them for what, exactly? For using their weaponry to force the will of a dictator on another nation? For killing people en masse? Apparently so.
I was outside Downing Street this week with the Channel 5 crew observing the armed police protecting the prime minister's house. I pointed out that only when they turn their guns around, point them at the house and say 'come out quietly with your hands up' will any kind of logic return to our society. The same with Bush.

Jean Charles de Menezes, an innocent Brazilian electrician, was held down and shot eight times - seven of them in the head - by police 'marksmen'. Nearly a year later no-one has been charged with this cold-blooded murder.

If it looks like fascism, talks like fascism and smells like fascism, then it's fascism. And today, the sight, sound and stink are there for all to see, hear and smell

Every time I have been with Brian Haw on the roadside opposite parliament there has been abuse from several passing drivers for what he is doing. Cindy Sheehan, the mother of an American soldier killed in Iraq, has been subjected to similar abuse for her criticism of the Bush war of terror. The two are playing much the same role either side of the Atlantic highlighting the real consequences of the wars of conquest and control. The mindless who shout their abuse will be the first to squeal when a uniformed thug knocks on their door, but by then it will be too late.
In 2003, Brian was assaulted by British soldiers and an Israeli man who broke his nose. The man walked away while police looked on. An American working at the US Embassy in London also broke Brian's nose. The Embassy said they could find no trace of the attacker in their midst, then suddenly he was arrested and bailed to appear in court. But he skipped bail and has never been seen since. I think America would be a good place to start looking, but, of course, they won't

[

Brian Haw's commitment to his cause, like Cindy Sheehan, is fantastic and, as he told me this week, it will continue because 'it's not getting any better is it? He says on his website:

'I want to go back to my own kids and look them in the face again knowing that I've done all I can to try and save the children of Iraq and other countries who are dying because of my government's unjust, amoral, fear - and money - driven policies. These children and people of other countries are every bit as valuable and worthy of love as my precious wife and children.'

When people look back on their lives and assess what they did and did not do, how many will be able to say that?

Amazing Quote
A quote from David Rockefeller's autobiography 'Memoirs' -
6-11-6

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will.

If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

im sorry, but i didnt come on here to read a novel.

then leave. goodbye, dont come back. idiot.

Originally posted by Deano
then leave. goodbye, dont come back. idiot.

yes they are idiots. If i want to post something long then its my right and freedom. if you dont like it then leave. shall i go around all the threads on kmc and state what i dont like about them?

you are an idiot yourself, i never said you had to read it did i? no thank you, now piss off and stop looking for an argument.

its there if people DO want to read it. I dont want to keep hearing idiots mention how long the article is etc.

i coudnt post links btw because what i posted is a newsletter that people have to pay for. you are getting it free.

im losing faith in humanity.

if people want to read it, how come everytime you post things like that all you get is complaints?

because this isnt a conspiracy website. there will be more complaints obviousuly. people wanting short sentences all the time.

wtf? anyway...who killed JFK Jr?

i did

Originally posted by Deano

I want to be one of them.

Originally posted by lord xyz
wtf? anyway...who killed JFK Jr?

Apparently by that video George Bush Jr

Originally posted by Bloigen
I want to be one of them.

You want to be a storm trooper? You know what that means, right? When the rebel forces...well rebel...you will be one of the many no named, and no faced victims of the revolution.

You know what they say. Can't make an omelet...