The Official KMC "Conspiracy" Thread

Originally posted by Deano
i admit it kharma

Don't do that Deano, I'll have to start respecting you if you start acting civilly. 😉

Originally posted by Deano
we know bush is in skull and bones which he says is TOO SECRET to talk about it.

The skull and bones is an organization that is based on a bunch of rich, elitist college weenies who form an organization to further their elite status and position in their own eyes. They have rituals only to make it seem more secret and special. It's like a frat to the power of 10 and should be disregarded as equally stupid as fraternities are. It is nothing more, and nothing less.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
some people wonder how they were able to put bombs in the building without going undetected.well the answer to that well shock a lot of people.Most of them were already planted when they were originally built.

The world trade center buildings went under construction in 1966.and were completed in 1973. Could you please research as to what explosives were used and could stability be stored in the construction of a building for over thirty years and what triggering device was also used that would remain effective after such a long period of dormancy?

Anyone who believes that the buildings where built with explosives planted in them is a functioning idiot.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
It seems that when the governement builds huge buildings like that,unbeknowest to the city commission planning,bombs are put in high rise buildings like that in case something happens like that so that when the building is falling apart,instead of toppling over and landing on other buildings they are detonated so that they come down like they did.That way they dont tip over and fall on other buildings.shocking and scary but it makes sense.

It does not make sense at all. What makes sense is that architects go to school and study as to how to build a super structure that has structural failsafes in the event of a disaster or demolition. I suggest you step back from the computer and get a grip on reality.

I also suggest that you go to an established and reputable architect in your area and ask him about the finer details of this subject. By taking such steps you will undoubtedly learn something and look much less like the simpleton you make yourself seem for posting such ridiculous trash.

Ofcourse he is, ofcourse he is...however, he has a major problem...

Originally posted by KharmaDog

The world trade center buildings went under construction in 1966.and were completed in 1973. Could you please research as to what explosives were used and could stability be stored in the construction of a building for over thirty years and what triggering device was also used that would remain effective after such a long period of dormancy?

Anyone who believes that the buildings where built with explosives planted in them is a functioning idiot.

I love him I do I do I do I do I dooooooooooo

i doubt the bombs were already in the building for that long. but its possible for them to be planted in the building at certain times, months before the planes hit.

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse".

- Van Romero, Vice President For Research At New Mexico Institute Of Mining And Technology

"There were definitely bombs in those buildings ... many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the 'higher-ups' forbid discussion of this fact"

- NYFD Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman Paul Isaac

“There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons . . . There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run."

- Teresa Veliz, WTC 1 Employee, 47th Floor

"Anybody who has ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows, that if you're going to do this, you have to get at the under infrastructure of a building and bring it down."

- Peter Jennings, ABC News Live Coverage, 9/11/2001.

"I felt the ground shake, I turned around and ran for my life. I made it as far as the Financial Center when the collapse happened"

- NYC EMT Lonnie Penn, Describing The Moments Just Prior To The Collapse Of WTC 2, 9/11/2001.

"There is an explosion at the base of the building … white smoke from the bottom … something happened at the base of the building! Then another explosion.”

- WNYW Fox 5 Anchor Describing First Seconds Of The Collapse Of WTC 2 , 9/11/2001.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I love him I do I do I do I do I dooooooooooo

I see the kid still goes on an insulting rampage if someone disagrees with him.the kid has memory and reading comprehension problems.he cant see to remember I said i dont read his insane ramblings anymore. 🙄

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I see the kid still goes on an insulting rampage if someone disagrees with him.the kid has memory and reading comprehension problems.he cant see to remember I said i dont read his insane ramblings anymore. 🙄

The "kid" is very much older than you and you must've read my post to comment about it.

Do you ride a special bus?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
I see the kid still goes on an insulting rampage if someone disagrees with him.the kid has memory and reading comprehension problems.he cant see to remember I said i dont read his insane ramblings anymore. 🙄

I'm sorry, when you say the kid do you mean me or KD?

But here's the funny thing, if you are talking about KD he can bring up tons of evidence from various sorces to show that all these Conspiracy theories are rubbish, but rather than find counter evidence, you just say all the papers,historians,journalists,politicians who ever say anything un supportive of Icke are Illuminati

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
So, if the CIA can fake a terrorist attack on such a scale...can't a few plebs fake finding this evidence which, if true, would be everywhere!

yeah but there were bombs that went off obviously.you cant disregard physics on where a case like this where if a plane ran into a builidng like it did,without the bombs,,the buildings would topple over and land on another one.It wouldnt just conviently collapse like that.You see those movies where they detonate a building with bombs and thats exactly how the buildings go.they collapse downwards.Not topple over.Plus you cant dismiss the firefighters testimony that they heard bombs going off one after another.These were firemen talking about how they have put out fires before where bombs went off and buildings and they are saying -so we know what bombs sound like and those were bombs.Also there are photos of the buildings where there are pieces of metal sticking out of windows.the governments explanation of them is that its aluminum,the problem with their explanation though is that aluminum reflects light,where metal doesnt.

Metal Girders perhaps? Which wern't properlly fireproofed, also, you can't disregard that bag's might have been left here or there, well hidden, it's not too difficult, especially in pre-9/11 America.

"the buildings would topple over and land on another one"

No it wouldn't. That is YOUR gibberish physics, not ours.

And you have about three firemen saying that. Compare that to dozens or more who saw no such thing.

A couple of crackpots make some wild claims, and you want to take their word over the many many experts who can simply demonstrate how silly all these ideas are. it is very sad.

Case in point- Deano quotes Romero.

Bad mistake. Romero never meant to say any such thing.

"I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building."

Romero, like all serious experts in the field, says it was the fire.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
"the buildings would topple over and land on another one"

No it wouldn't. That is YOUR gibberish physics, not ours.

And you have about three firemen saying that. Compare that to dozens or more who saw no such thing.

A couple of crackpots make some wild claims, and you want to take their word over the many many experts who can simply demonstrate how silly all these ideas are. it is very sad.

their more plausible than the silly explananations the governmet has given. 😄 Jones isnt a crackpot.he has all the resources to back up his claims.Its not MY gibberish physics,its physics from experts I have heard this from,NOT my ideas.the many experts are the ones whos testimony I go by.

Jones' work is not peer reviewed and has been rubbished by his colleagues and just about every expert in the field. He is, after all, a theoretical physicist and NOT a structural engineer.

The building should have collapsed exactly as it did.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Metal Girders perhaps? Which wern't properlly fireproofed, also, you can't disregard that bag's might have been left here or there, well hidden, it's not too difficult, especially in pre-9/11 America.

possible but it just shows that the government has been incompetent from the very beginning on this case.that they dont have a clue what they are talking about.thaty they didnt coosider that possiblity.

Since Deano is offline, I shall reply to Ush's post in the same we he would,

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Case in point- Deano quotes Romero.

Bad mistake. Romero never meant to say any such thing.

"I was misquoted in saying that I thought it was explosives that brought down the building."

Romero, like all serious experts in the field, says it was the fire.

Back to sensible me, We have talked about 9/11 over and over, but it gets nowhere, why?
Because Deano or mr Parker can post something, KharmaDog will then say, ah, but thats not true, the evidence here, here and here show this is the case.

Deano>>>>Ahh, but this milelong quote clearly says that your fourteeen different sources are all from papers, or statements which where censored by the Illuminati...

Let's talk about somethign else!

what about the other quotes ush

Originally posted by Mr Parker
possible but it just shows that the government has been incompetent from the very beginning on this case.that they dont have a clue what they are talking about.thaty they didnt coosider that possiblity.

Thats what Mr Moore said, but i'm told by Deano he's a fat ass...

moore left out lots of stuff in his documentary. the really hardcore 9/11 issues

Originally posted by Deano
what about the other quotes ush

Oh, what, some crazy on the spot comments from journalists and the confused account from someone who was inside a collapsing building? oh WOW, everything I know must be wrong!

Not wanting to disappoint you, Deano, but the collapse of those buildings will be one of the most visual things of this century. Just aboht evceryone can see it. Experts are nearly united on what happened, which is not what you are suggesting happened, and someone fleeing for her life saying that it felt like there were explosions going off- hardly surprising when a large part of the building was on fire- is not going to change that.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I'm sorry, when you say the kid do you mean me or KD?

But here's the funny thing, if you are talking about KD he can bring up tons of evidence from various sorces to show that all these Conspiracy theories are rubbish, but rather than find counter evidence, you just say all the papers,historians,journalists,politicians who ever say anything un supportive of Icke are Illuminati

yeah I mean KD.LOL. Everything I have seen KD bring has been rubbish and HASNT disproved any of it.The proof is in the pudding from the websites such as infowars.com and rense.you just got to be open minded about it.He is so close minded about the issue that its impossible to reason with him on it.and uh,I think you are confusing me with Deano.whats this about the Illuminati and Icke? I havent been saying anything about that.Thats Deanos thing. 😉