Maul vs kit

Started by Darth_Glentract4 pages

Kit was wasted against Sidious while Dooku, his is at least as powerful Sidious held Maul in high esteem. Maul also klilled two Jedi Masters.

And if you think about it only about 4 or 5 people were skilled enough to defeat him (during TPM) that list includes Mace Windu, Yoda, Count Dooku, Darth Sidious, and perhaps Cin Drallig.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Kit was wasted against Sidious while Dooku, his is at least as powerful Sidious held Maul in high esteem. Maul also klilled two Jedi Masters.

This doesn't mean Kit wouldn't waste Maul. Maul still got killed by a Padawan whereas Kit got killed by a Sith Lord. A very powerful one.

Maul defeated that same padawan and killed his Master.

In any case, EU Kit Fisto could win. Movie Kit Fisto would get owned. I'd like to point out that Kit fisto's badassedness is not reinforced in ROTS in what is the worst battle sequence in modern history.

In any case Maul had defeated the jedi oder's best swordsman outside of Mace, Yoda, and Dooku even if it was in the TPM era. That makes his defeat of Anoon Bondara even more impressive being that IMO Anoon's skill is superior to that of Qui-Gon Jinn.

Which is doubtful since Qui-Gon lasted longer.

How do you know it lasted longer did it say how long his duel with Anoon lasted, heck they didn't even finish.

Maul had been injured by Togorians when he fought Qui-gon though. Qui-gon also had Obi-wan, while Anoon fought alone.

Originally posted by Lord Simus
Maul defeated that same padawan and killed his Master.

Maul didn't defeat Kenobi. Kenobi KILLED Maul. Maul lost.

Maul still defeated him.

Meh, whatever. I am not gonna debate a stupid thread on two characters who we don't know jack shit about to Maul sympathesizers.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Maul still defeated him.

No, you see, in order to defeat someone, you have to NOT HAVE THEM KILL YOU!!!!

Originally posted by Sorgo
No, you see, in order to defeat someone, you have to NOT HAVE THEM KILL YOU!!!!

lmfao

Not true. Maul defeated him during the actual fight, if was only after that he was defeated.

No, Obi-Wan beat his ass, and he only gained the advantage through Force pushing Obi into the pit. This was not a saber victory and if anything Maul got horribly schooled by Obi-wan. Saber cut in half, kicked on his ass. That never happens to anyone else. Not even Anakin.

Maul was damn near defeated until he used the pit to his advantage, and then stilllost.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Not true. Maul defeated him during the actual fight, if was only after that he was defeated.

By that logic the south won the civil war.

Still, Dooku showing Maul respect but not Obi-wan shows a lot. This is Obi-wan even 13 years after Maul died.

But it doesn't show enough for this fight. Potentially? IT could go either way. Read The Cestus Deception and then tell me Maul sucks. He's better than AOTC Obi-Wan.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Not true. Maul defeated him during the actual fight, if was only after that he was defeated.

The actual fight? So the fight ended when Kenobi got kicked into the Pit?

Maul kicks Kenobi into the pit.....

Maul: Oh boy! Now I can open my champagne because now that Kenobi is in the pit, the victory is automatically mine! Even if he did live!

Kenobi hops out and cuts Maul in half......

Maul: Damn.... Well...Er....AHA! I KICKED YOU INTO THE PIT! I STILL WON!

Kenobi: Shut up.

Kenobi kicks Maul's upper torso into the pit.

Maul: Wait, throw me my champagneeeeeeeeeee