Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
And this opinion is what prompted you to start a thread where everyone is encouraged to post different variations of the same derrogetory term?
I certainly have not encouraged the posting of insults - I stated I could think of more for gay men than any other and asked why?
Originally posted by PVS
well, in whirly's defense, i would hardly put a term mocking anal sex on the same level as mocking the act of burning a human being alive.
Come on PVS, we're not talking about where words came from. We're talking today. I appreciate your insight, but I'm confused as to why you think calling someone a "rectal ranger" is any less offensive than calling them a f@ggot?